Board index JoyofSatan666 Jewish Control of Third Sex Rights Parts 3a and 3b

Jewish Control of Third Sex Rights Parts 3a and 3b

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Satan.

Topics of discussion include: Demons, Magick, Satanic Witchcraft and much more!

http://www.joyofsatan.org/

hammerofthegods_666 Site Admin

Posts: 71
Here are parts 3a and 3b of The Jewish Control of Third Sex Rights sermon. The reason the terms "White Race" and "White Aryans," etc., are used so frequently in my sermons, is because when I put up my Third Sex Thule Society website in 2015, I made a promise to Satan that I would prioritize his direct human direct descendants, as we are planet Earth's most endangered species. Although most of the sermons on my website are written for a White audience, the information about the enemy Jewish kikes and their crimes against humanity, affect all human beings.

http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.co ... control3a/

http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.co ... control3b/

Any harsh-sounding words towards the third sex members of society are not intended as insults in any way, but I realize that this is a very lonely path, in that I am one of the very few third sex individuals, let alone who happens to be a Satanist who actually give a rat's ass about the future of his Race. Although Satan wants me to lead the third sex population, it is time for all of our people to wake up from their Christian and Marxist comas.

666/88!!

High Priest Jake Carlson

http://www.joyofsatan.com

http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.com/about/


Posts: 284
Thank you for this Carlson (:

Third Sex is truly an interesting topic, I'm curious if it has ever been shown in other cultures through art or communications. I see that you mention on the writing online but I've always been unable to find anything really related to such.
Satanic Information/Art 4 Social Media Sharing:
https://thesatanictruth.tumblr.com/
(All art legal to share, and public domain. Continually updated.)

hammerofthegods_666 Site Admin

Posts: 71
Anne Flowers wrote:
Thank you for this Carlson (:

Third Sex is truly an interesting topic, I'm curious if it has ever been shown in other cultures through art or communications. I see that you mention on the writing online but I've always been unable to find anything really related to such.




Thank you for your interest, Anne. Actually, it was High Priest Don Mageson who made me interested in the topic of the Third Sex/Twin Souls being an Aryan alternative to the Jewish "LGBT" crap.

I have a book by Amara Das Wilhelm that can be purchased on http://www.amazon.com. It is titled Tritiya-Prakriti: People of the Third Sex: Understanding Homosexuality, Transgender Identity, and Intersex Conditions Through Hinduism.

However, the only people I can recommend this book to are people who can read between the lines. This book's author is very Jewish liberal-leftist. He associates so-called "homophobia" with the rise of "caste-consciousness" which is a great big Jewish crock of shit.

The truth is that, despite leftist assholes like Amara Das Wilhelm's bullshit theories that conform to Liberalism, and thus, Marxism, the Third Sex has been around, and has been accepted [not merely "tolerated"] by and in White Aryan societies, since the beginning of time. It is also quite common among our Aryan Pagan Gods, just like it is among humans and animals. Even Satan, Himself, is bi-sexual.

For those who wish that the Vikings were against homosexuality, please read http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.co ... sexuality/ and find out for yourselves.

666/88!!

High Priest Jake Carlson

http://www.joyofsatan.com

http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.com/about/


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
THANKYOU! This might be the greatest sermon on JoS. I cannot say enough how insightful it was. I have some questions.

How does the weakness gene actually work they want to spread?

You speak of the jews promoting the theird sex to lower birthrate. Does this mean from the jews perspective, they would like to increase the number of gays? That is, above the percent that we can generally expect to see in nature. Such as raise it from 5% (about what it is) to 10, 15, 20 etc in order to have even more people opting out of having children?

Your revelation about marriage was a huge deal for me. A shocker. I know you are busy, and this sermon must have been so much work, but I'd like if you write more on the marriage topic at some later date.

Reading thru the section where you talk about marriage in pagan times, you say it was more an occupation in a sense, and that it was a contract to have kids, and they could have side action.

What would happen to kids born from this side action? I assume a man of good intent would just make her a wife if she was also willing? He could continue with other women, but keep her to properly support the child?

You also talk about romance. Were wives not so much emphasized about being romantic? Were the side lovers more the romantic focus? I do realize any combination could happen, such as a wife also being romantic, but I am wondering about how it generally worked. I also assume there has to be some level of liking the person to raise a child for 18 years together.

I know we are just learning more about this but perhaps you have an opinion on this.

Was it okay to have a wife or wives but also have other careers? I want 1 wife that is like my top girl, that is my romantic


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
My comment got cut. Here is the rest.

I know we are just learning more about this but perhaps you have an opinion on this.

Was it okay to have a wife or wives but also have other careers? I want 1 wife that is like my top girl, that is my romantic interest and then have several other wives to make many children, and then I will have side people too possibly.

But I also want to have my own career aside from kids, and  some other side projects. So maybe my wives can help raise kids so I can still be able to do other things and help build the Reich and practice woodworking and fishing and farming and stuff.

Also is it wrong or unfair that I want this side action but... I'm really not that cool with my future wives having side action. Like I'd let there be action among any people I'm married to, but not outside of that, but I'd want to still look around outside my marriage (es).

So yeah this is why I always said I need to live forever as a kid. Too much to do lol.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5483
The jews are promoting the Yolo life of being an eternal, hipster cosmopolitan consumer to Whites now to make sure they don't form normal families and have children. And because of jewish capitalism both parents have to work which makes it harder to have a family.


Posts: 151
I think that that view on marriage is right. I mean.. A lot of people cant stay loyal to each other these days which is degeneracy of the population too but there are people that are more monogamous and there are those that are more towards polygamy ..

Anyway what I would like to say to heilodin is that people whom see others as possession rather than beings of their own do not have a place in a healthy civilisation. This is hard for most if not all of us because of all those programs and curses the enemy has send on us to confuse.

Being possesive is not a good trait. If you want multiple women (or men if youre a woman) then at least be decent enough to let your lovers have their own choices in whom they want to be with or not. Dont demand them to be yours only like a slave.


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
Thanks Roswitha. Yes, I am not totally sure. I can see your point so I am not sure if I am right or wrong. It seems to me that I have some tendency to dislike non loyalty and a bit of what you may say is possesive for lack of a better term. I don't know if there is programming inside me that causes this that I yet need to clear.

I still feel there are some good reasons that can be stated for my tendency. For example, if I have a wife that also has side action and gets pregnant, she now is going to bring 2 new people into my life whether I like it or not. Her child, and all the scheduling and responsibility around that, and the other man. He could be some piece of shit for all I know that only brings me liability and trouble, but you know what, he'd still be around here and there when he wants to see his kid and the mother.

Also there is much STD these days. More closed relationships guards against that. I wish there were none to make free love more possible and carefree. But I could have a lover bring and spread an STD to me or my other lovers before we even catch it. So hopefully the Reich can eliminate all STD.

I see merit in a hierarchy type of structure. Maybe I can put people in a ranking so to say. Have a clique at the top with a Romantic partner that is exclusive and loyal and a great soulmate. Have some wives also that are exclusive to me (by their choice, and mine) and loyal and we will have kids.

Then below that I can have partners and people that are friends or just people I've tested the waters with. These can be people that I never intend to be serious with, or they just fit well as casual friends/lovers. They can be free to have other lovers because it would be wrong to assume loyalty with our more casual connection or the fact we haven't got that serious yet. Kind of how it would be wrong to assume total loyalty after like 1 date with a person.

Idk. Everything has been confused and we all are trying to rebuild. We can see from divorce rates and empty relationships that things aren't working. I think HAMMER has brought us a step closer to fixing things.

hammerofthegods_666 Site Admin

Posts: 71
I apologize for any confusion I may have caused. What HeilOdin666 stated are all things to take into consideration in this day and age. Although I missed my own mark in regards to the purpose of marriage, my aim was to emphasize that marriage, in pre-Christian Pagan times, despite some same-sex marriage, was still mostly a heterosexual institution, and that it wasn't quite the same as marriage as we know it today. I needed to place an emphasis on the need to repopulate planet Earth with the White Aryan Race of Satan, as a result of the pending Race War, and all of the Rapefugees flooding White Europe, turning what was Satan's people into brown Europe. That is what I had in mind. I made mention of romantic relationships, but within the context of classical style relationships that were popular in Greece and the Roman Empire.

As to whether or not the Jews really hope to create more homosexuals... *sigh* If the Jews can keep turning White Aryan homosexuals against the traditional Pagan family and White Civilization, while harvesting the "meekness gene" of Christos, thus preventing homosexuals from returning to their origin Warrior consciousness, so that they will never be a threat to the Jews again, then "hell" yeah, they want to create more homosexuals.

However, if this fails and blows up in the Jewish kikes' faces, then, White Aryan homosexuals will be on the Jews' shit list just as much as White heterosexuals. The only difference between a homosexual and a heterosexual is which gender a person is attracted to. The Jewish kikes have worked overtime to sissify, domesticate, and pervert this section of the White Race to create "differences" that were not originally there. Ten years ago, Satan, and High Priestess Maxine Dietrich gave me a position as a Joy of Satan High Priest to re-educate both heterosexuals and the third sex, in regards to the truth about homosexuality. I admit that while my spelling and grammar are nearly perfect, I am not the greatest at getting my points across, and I apologize for any confusion.

666/88!!

High Priest Jake Carlson

http://www.joyofsatan.com

http://gbltthulesociety666.angelfire.com/about/


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
Don't apologize. I ask questions because it's all deep topics. No one post will ever cover it all. I thought your Sermon was amazing!

I say "confusing" in regards to living life. People are so caught up in a Web of confusion. Even this latest sermon shows we don't know it all, and we are still learning more.

People don't know about loving, relationships, marriage, sexuality, romance etc. We've been cut off totally and then fed lies. The societal disfunction is evidence of this.

I must ask. If marriage was for procreation, what then was the appeal of it for homosexuals? 

Also, is everyone destined to have a romantic partner in life? What even is Romance? And what is love? And how do we romance and love?

What advise and knowledge do you have for young people on these matters? I ask for the benefit of clarification for us all, but also my own reasons. Do I think I know what love is? No. Do I think I know what Romance is? No. What can you speak about them?

I have reason to belive I've suffered lifelong curses against me from the Jews. Generalized cursing aimed for anyone that might amount to something in life.

And a result of that, is I have been challenged badly in these matters you speak of with romance, love, relationships, sex, marriage etc. And I've never had anything very serious with a partner. Nothing that was loving, or  romantic. Nothing frutiful.

 And I am developmentally way behind in this area due to horrible Xtian abuse as well (may they fucking die). So I ask because I don't know, and you seem deep and passionate and very wise to all these matters.

Lastly do you mean this meekness gene is something spiritual or is it an actual physical gene on the chromosome? How does the spiritual decision of being Xtian create a gene that will then be passed on?


Posts: 134
Location: a pogrom near you...
HeilOdin666 wrote:
...
HeilOdin666, you ask very thought provoking questions and I thank you for this. As for your ideas on marriage and having a hierarchy within one's multitude of wives, I think that's a very good solution to the issues you mentioned. I, too, want multiple wives, but I do want the Lilith to my Satan, so to speak - the one partner who is my favorite. I have the same feelings as you in that I wouldn't want my other wives to be with other men - even if that sounds shallow. We are all individuals, of course, and I don't see anything wrong with this as long as it is a consensual agreement between the husband and wife.

As for the "meekness gene" that HP Jake Carlson mentioned, I believe he means it is so deeply ingrained into Christians spiritually, it is basically (although not literally) a part of them - although no further than the extent of one's samskaras. So not physically but very deeply spiritually.
"Thou shalt worship the Superman, the Elite of the Race, the Lord of all the kingdoms of the earth and the glory of them, and Him only shalt thou serve." -Adolf Hitler


Posts: 151
I was also wondering about the woman must live with husband part. Thats the traditional thought.

Though it could work for some there are some people that I can imagine would just wither because of that.. Lack of space.

Besides wouldnt you be super busy if you had so many wives/lovers xD ?
Plus if youre both each others nr 1 there shouldnt be a problem :)

Plus they call romance a dinner out together but I dont get what is so romantic about that. Movies are not that romantic either.


Posts: 151
Plus.. Isnt it supposed to be possible to have some kind of anticonception thats not the pill..

And then there is condoms.


Posts: 151
Lol third reply..

I dont think its normal that everyone knows whom sleeps with whom tbh. Like said its your own business so its very well possible that lovers dont know whom else their partners have in polygamous relationships.

Should you even know that stuff from your partner? Maybe if its the one you like most but still..


Posts: 386
Location: Aryasthan
Having multiple wives is not for everyone, as highlighted in previous posts. It takes a remarkable heterosexual man to be able to satisfy all of his lovers. Also women are not property of the man. They are allowed to do the same if the wish so. It's all built on a consensus between all the individuals involved. This was for HeilOdin666.

Now, I don't know what marriage was in the future. I see it as more of a formality than something necessary. As an homosexual man, I'll leave this to my future partner. If he'll want to marry me, fine; if he doesn't, whatever. The important thing is the emotional depth of the relationship, for what concerns me. Formalities be damned.
Triumphus albae gentis suprema lex esto.

Fear is not evil. It tells you what your weakness is. And once you know your weakness, you can become stronger.

I'll do what I want till the end. Cut me down if you want.

HEIL SATAN!
HEIL AZAZEL!
HEIL HITLER!
HEIL ALL THE GODS OF DUAT!
SIEG HEIL!


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
PART I

This is not meant as an attack on anyone or their views. To explain more about possesiveness of a wife, and my and many people's view against wives having side action.

I feel that if you allow me to impregnate you, you willing give some possession to me of you. You just tied us together thru the raising of a child for years to come. I think it goes deeper spiritually but I will not get so deep with that in this post.

Do people not realize that it's going to be spiritually and biologically hardwired into a man, that they now have some level of obligation to protect, nurture, guide and provide for the mother of his child? To uplift her?

 Even in horrible divorces and things, how many times does a man show up when the woman is in distress? How many times does it happen he helps her financially or gives her a ride when her car breaks, or helps her with home projects or protects her from the next lover that is actually dangerous to her? I've seen it.

And with this wiring and nature to man to support the mother does it not come with some possesion as some might say? If a person has a house they have to look after it. They have to maintain it. Do they not possess it? Why do people want the house maintained by a man that does not possess the house? Should he be a slave with no rights forced to maintain the house? Is the house opressed and he a selfish controlling bastard?

And also on the human level, that knowing somebody so intimately, and being let into their world, their mind, their spirit their body, does let the other person into your house so to speak and imply some right to be there?


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
Part II

To further add, I think wives having side action is not ideal. Of course there are exceptions but I speak generally. Like, "my husband lost his dick in battle but still we love each other and he wants me to be happy" is an exception.

Man evolved from villiages, to countries and as we are told ever advances when allowed to, to higher ever levels of organization, and stability and progress. Nationals Socialism is an example of this hierarchy and progress and social structure taken even further.

And I think people in their social lives go thru this as well. People start off with no friends and they evolve and get a group or groups and create a clique or more. And I think they evolve to higher order as social beings and lovers to the family unit (assuming they are ready and mature enough during this incarnation, and not gay for example).

And I think many people when young are not to the high evolved level yet. And they often MUST be casual in their love life. Free love. Have fun. Learn who you are. See what you like. Gain experience.

And I think they will in time evolve to the family unit, a higher order/structure. And a man with many wives is almost a micro community in and of itself. And wives having side action could be a threat to the structure. They imho skipped from lower levels of their evolution and got trapped in marriage prematurely, thus they aren't totally ready to settle down and want other men.

Interestingly how many women are bisexual or even don't claim to be, but have at least tried it out before? Not sure if true but I hear that many have done so. This may support the idea of  many wives where the wives traditionally and evolutionary may have had fun among themselves within the micro community of the family unit.

I really really don't mean to piss anyone off. And at the end of the day how others live doesn't affect me that much. So if I'm off base, for the sake of the truth, shoot holes in any ideas I propose if you must.


Posts: 151
Are you saying all woman are naturally monogamous???

That does not seem right to me.


Posts: 134
Location: a pogrom near you...
I think all of these points being brought up are valid, from both sides, because as HP Jake Carlson said, sexual preferences do not affect our spiritual progress in any way whatsoever. So going off of that, this is all PURELY based on the consensual agreement between the adults involved in these relationships. If a woman wanted multiple husbands, and wanted none of these husbands with any other women, that is perfectly fine, as long as all of the individuals involved have given their consent to such. And vice versa. And in all the variations that may exist.

I guess what the real argument at hand is, is what is acceptable or not. And that leads back to my previous point of everything is acceptable (from a Satanic point of view, not with some Jewish mindset of 50 shades of gray shit of course).
"Thou shalt worship the Superman, the Elite of the Race, the Lord of all the kingdoms of the earth and the glory of them, and Him only shalt thou serve." -Adolf Hitler


Posts: 134
Location: a pogrom near you...
Also the example I used in my previous post disregards the fact that the White race is in dire need of being repopulated, but I'm talking about in a perfect world in our future Satanic kingdom.
"Thou shalt worship the Superman, the Elite of the Race, the Lord of all the kingdoms of the earth and the glory of them, and Him only shalt thou serve." -Adolf Hitler


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
Part 3

No. Please take what I say, as my belief as to what the general flow of things is (not an all encompassing rule ). I'd say in nature many people start out NOT monogamous. They evolve towards monogamous-esque relations in their personal evolution imo.

I think people often need to NOT be monogamous when young, and with age they evolve out of that. Some right off the bat when young may prefer monogamy from previous lives of family building. I also believe new souls can possibly not reach the point of monogamy within their current incarnation. They have not evolved enough yet to be ready for it.

They grow and eventually advance into the higher social structure of the family unit. A higher advancement in one form of that is a man with multiple wives. I'd say women who are meant for family life, often evolve as they age into a relationship where they are loyal to one man, but this still does not mean they are monogamous.

They may have relations with the other wives, if they are so inclined and this may even be very beneficial to the micro community of this family. Perhaps they even have relations with women outside the family, and this can be beneficial and actually bring more wives in, and create more children. It can also bring complications to think about, so it would also be a judgement call on everyone's part if that's allowed.

This is all just imho, and also not what I see as set in stone rules with no exceptions. I believe this to be generally true though as to how the family unit is a higher order and how people evolve into this order.


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
Part 4

Now I do think there could be a family structure in which a woman recieve more than one penis.  This would be an advanced social structure in which there husbands and wives all mixed into one group.

Notice though how we all have a boss. Or a governor of our state. Or a president. Or a high priest. There always forms a pyramid with someone at top. So even if someone recieve more than one penis, there is more than likely someone at the top they are loyal to.

And I think monogamy and terms like this are very binding and a mindset of the enemy. Who knows maybe the boss is fine with this or that. Maybe the boss isnt. Maybe he is fine with this or that just once for fun. Maybe he isnt. It just depends who is the boss. So I think it comes down to loyalty and structure above any terms and semantics we use.

Further I think it's possible (but less common) and equally valid to have a woman at the top of the social pyramid of the family. It's structure would be different and I won't make 5 more posts about that.

I also belive our incredibly simplistic family structures, or lack of structure, and the lack of diversity of the structure of family units in the world, are indicative of the destruction of gentile pagan culture that the enemy has done to us.


Posts: 151
Actually it wouldnt surprise me having a woman as head of the family, because simply women usually tend to understand certain problems better, plus the moon cycle part and use of intuition could be very beneficial to a family esp when it comes to things like sabbats. Men tend to have their strengths elsewhere, so they could take lead of that.

I dont think one person for all issues is the way to go tbh.


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
I would like to hear more about the moon cycle and sabbats and use of intuition that you speak of in regards to a woman as head of the family. That seems very interesting.

I don't think the family is like some North Korean dictatorship. Or that the head calls all shots necessarily. Just like on teams, or at a job, or in a play, all are there to play their part. Maybe one person in the family is an expert on XYZ and they even has more authority on XYZ than the head.

I just think always some natural leader will emerge, whether it's stated or intended or not. Some people will set out to form these social units and by that fact will probably become and remain the leader. Some may emerge out of the group naturally.

I do believe strongly that sexually they will remain loyal to whoever is the at the top of the pack. Not always even due to some iron fist. They may voluntarily take this position of loyalty to whoever is at the top, for their love and respect of that person.

I believe the head of the family will more than likely, also be sexually the the "leader" or the top person. But I think it is possible to have someone sexually whom the others look up to, that is not the head if the family.

To me there really are so many structures a family unit could take. We really need diverse family units, units that differ according to where people are at in life, to individual needs and preferences, societal and economic conditions etc. These diverse but structured units build a strong foundation for all of society.

Now I think we have got pretty far out in all this, and developed some good ideas. It's too far for me to see at this point as to whether or not "in general" women or men should be heads of families. Perhaps in a family unit there exists both a male and female member as co heads. I do believe strongly that in general it is most likely going to be a man that is at the sexual top. Even if he is at the bottom of other matters.


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
I also believe maybe we both are aiming to create our own family units! LOL. Would you Roswitha want to start one of your own, or join another or belong to one at all?


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
I also believe maybe we both are aiming to create our own family units! LOL. Would you Roswitha want to start one of your own, or join another or belong to one at all?


Posts: 318
Location: 4th Reich
I also wonder why do some women have the fantasy of "let me be gangbanged. Let me be groupraped." This is imho a corrupted jewish proposition. The Jewish answer to take place of her past that is speaking to her. The ancestral tradition of being in a family unit that probably did have several men and women being together as a unit. She probably would have had several men to please her. So now in porn they propose the scenario of 3 black guys banging some aryan when it would traditionally be like what I stated above.

This also speaks to the, "let some black guy cuck my wife". Maybe this guy was meant to be in the complex family unit, where there was some other men or even an alpha that he had to....umm not to be crude... share holes with.

So yeah, I think this is people's pagan past speaking to them, that was robbed from them, and then jewish destrucItive alternatives are presented.


Posts: 151
I was referring to the moon cycle as in menstruation because we were talking about feminine stuff like this on the SS health group.
One of the things was that a womans cycle was according to the moon which also has influence on the psyche and openness which actually makes sense and some things were also mentioned on the Hellsarmy group. Although those videos.. I wouldnt call them completely accurate.

Those things do seem to consist of peoples opinions so it isnt closed factual evidence or something but thats okay.
I see that youve given this much thought though.

Family does seem important to me but I think that it could be lack of such ties that makes me miss fun that some people have like go to the movies with a cousin or something if you get what I mean.

I can not give a conclusive answer to your question because I am not completely certain on that although I do seem to not really get along with many people so if I could pick them myself unless born into thatd be great I think.



As for the gangbanged stuff.. I watched one video once and it just looked like she was fed penusses. Yeah no way that that is fun or proper way of having sex.
Perhaps just something new to try. I dont think teenagers or kids realize that much what it actually is esp not with all that garbage thats plunged into their minds. Proper ethics and actually BEING with your child to teach them should be done. If the case would be that you have to bring he kids to a friend where theyd be safe without doubt and switch the roles throughout the week for lack of income otherwise thatd be fine. But there are also horrible stories regarding abuse on this. Maybe people just lack proper judgement.

Not quite sure what else to say on multiple men one woman but it very well could be part of nature too. Although Im not speaking about the obvious here like rape or way too many on one..


Ever heard people say that if it was a 3some a girl would like 2 men and a man would prefer 2 woman to do it with? Somehow made me think of that. Although would be different for bisexuals and such I guess.


Return to JoyofSatan666