Board index JoyofSatan666 National Socialism vs Other regimes

National Socialism vs Other regimes

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Satan.

Topics of discussion include: Demons, Magick, Satanic Witchcraft and much more!

http://www.joyofsatan.org/

Post Sat May 28, 2016 9:35 pm
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
There are many opinions who are contradicting themselves, especially by people who know nothing about neither National Socialism, the regimes of Socialism, Communism, or any other regime at all, but we will just dive into the center of it. With so much misinfo around and jewish brainwashing, many people think of National Socialism in an entirely another way than what it really was, or ever was aiming to be. This is jewish and systematic brainwashing of the masses, for reasons that will be understood later on as one reads. National Socialism is, and should be understood as the only Spiritual regime, with spiritual aims.

Its aim is to transcend the physical barriers and limitations that make people enslaved in the physical realm, transcend them into a higher order of existence, liberate them from everyday suffering as much as possible within the context of that reality allows. The jews however, think THEY are reality or "god" and they tried to destroy the NS regime, in order for this to never be successful. This is also coded in the Torah, where advanced civilizations are smitten into destruction, by the jewish "god". The jew is the bringer of misery, death and affliction.

Capitalism as many people can see, isn't the "dream" of becoming a multibillionaire. Well little do they tell you that this is obviously, impossible for most people as the Social Marxist and xian backing of this idea, is that "oh boi everyone can become all they want". Well soon people find out they really can't for a number of reasons. While you "can" become one, potentially, this is only just a chance or a possible choice. Nobody guarantees anyone like this. This is why in the West so many people are still stuck and the major part of the populace has struggles even for the most basic things. In fact, the definition of Communism is hardcore labor to the point of destruction of the people, which is in many places, a characteristic of Capitalism as well. Its merely that you don't really have some jew to whip you with a whip, but in all other ways, people are bound to work for hours upon hours, where the "8 hour" regime is nowhere to be found, as most people nowadays work for 10 or more hours, are in debt and they need to repay, etc.

Also lately, many people have problems with finding jobs, since the agreement of Capitalism says "It's up to you to find a job" and the State is not supposed to do anything for you. Neither is the State supposed to take care of you and make you "competitive" or give you the "competition tools" in order to successfully compete with others. If one just raises their head, especially in countries like America, what they will quickly see is that the jews are on the supposed "top". How did they get in the top, is simply, with money. With money and stolen wealth accumulated through capitalism, or through generations, they are in this age able to "leap forth" into the higher classes.

Capitalism is intellectualized stealing of human labor. Communism is outright, slave labor. Capitalism is just one or few step before it. And people are too thankful because that with jews around, life sucks so much, that it being a bit better, it makes them feel thousand times better. That's how bad things are. Capitalism, based on jewish greed, destroys civilization every now and then (economic crash in their dictionary) and when the kikes have salvaged what they perceive to be enough of it, they destroy Capitalism from within through "Social Marxism" and then they make the "Red March" in trying to Communise completely a country, stealing all the last freedoms people have won with hard labor.

As about the "Ideals" of Capitalism, the only notions where anyone gains any respect, are basically, numbers and how much money one has in their possession. The ideals are totally materialistic, material, materialist and greedy, filthy. There are basically no real "ideals" this is why the enemy has such an easy times chewing everything out of existence. This is technically the only level that creates any sort of "personality" or anything else. Society is degenerated to the point there are no mutual connections, people aren't seen as useful or useless individuals at heart and in their core (its all about the money anyway). Everyone is a number amongst numbers. Certainly, Capitalism is far better than "Communism" in anyway, but it doesn't gurantee a lot of things or safeguards ANY gate from which the jews can enter a society. Its also a regime focused on physicality and nowhere else in the end, producing nothing spiritual at all. Women are forced to work, with "silent" force, or because simply if they don't work a family cannot survive. Its rarely a matter of "choice".

Christianity is an ideal religion for Capitalism, since both are equally empty and Xianity is also the perfect chameleon for Liberalism as well. Xianity has no spirit, poses false choices, preaches false love, breeds emptiness and is obviously (look at the Vatican or your local preacher) a religion of Materialism. People are deceived into thinking they have countless choices, but one merely owns all sides of the choices and the illusion of choice makes people docile, blind and forms all sorts of "explanations" which in all their multitudes do not produce any valuable opposition into the eyes of the so called "jewish elite". In fact, the jews laugh at the predictability of people and their inability to understand what's up with this issue.

"Freedom" is a definition that merely has to do with how much money one does possess and nothing more. There are no other freedoms really. One can be at 100 places, and not be at one, and all sorts of useless, depraved and stupid stuff under the disguise of "freedom" come in the game. If good things come out of this "freedom", that is mostly up to the people, certainly, not those who run Hollywood, or own the Corps, or whatever else. One just needs to raise the veil and see how many people are literally rotting in anxiety everyday, in order to understand how horrible the situation is.

To the point where you see people are just too bored with their lives and they make a culture around a plant named marijuana, or something. Capitalism with all its "colors" and "fancy stuff" is also a perfect regime for Race mixing. In Capitalism/Liberalism, the jewish cucks do not force anyone with the whip. They just attack people through projections, sly technology, tampering with food supplies, turning them slowly into well educated slave workers, giving them fake aims that can be achieved normally in 6 months, over a lifetime, and by creating a comparisson system between one's self and other human beings, so when you are higher, you feel some sort of vain "comfort" that you can't forego.

As for Socialism, we can be brief. Socialism on its own means, stealing the money from everyone to merely implement supposed castles in the sky. It has failed in all countries and drew them to impoverishment. In the words of Lenin, the Commie Himself, Socialism is a thing to be sought for as its the transitory phase from Capitalism to Communism. It prepares the masses to know nothing, drowns them into debt, it again has no real rights like gun ownership, ownership is completely undermined or abolished, production is slowly fending off destruction etc.

What is many times more horrible than Capitalism, is Communism, and this subject is way too conversated about. This is again one thing Capitalism prey's on about, bragging that its so far better than Communism. Which in reality, it CERTAINLY is. That doesn't mean that things couldn't be even BETTER. With jews, though, everything is so severely hard to do, that Capitalism is gladly desired to compared to other regimes of the enemy. But let's just repeat the simple fundementals. The jews in Communism are at the top, visibly. Methods like whip, outright physical violence etc, can take place, as the enemy is not afraid of any revolt having gone open. Murder becomes common place, while in Capitalism, the "System bloats you out".

Communsim: An open, Talmudic implementation system on the physical realm, where as the bible says, the "Messiah Rules with an Iron Rod", over the slaves. People are physically enslaved in this regime. People are worked to death and there isn't any time in spirituality, no ideals, no spiritual longings at all, no aims, not even languages and cultures in most ways. People are 100% reduced to animal levels. This is the lowest it can go. Christianity can, or cannot survive this, which equals the same thing. Owning guns is self evident, as nobody is allowed to own guns. Men, women and children from a very young age, are forced to work equally.

Since xianity has served its purpose in making the masses open to slavery, it is many times removed. Everyone is amassed into one clump and people are merely controlled by the State as workforce, getting commands by the jews and not even sleeping properly. In many times monthly pay is abolished and people are payed only with food, or with stays in the state factories. Obviously there is no freedom of speech and no freedoms of ideas, let alone health sectors and anything else. There are also no classes, no races and no identities anymore. Everyone is one under the jews, while the jews are themselves classified and arranged in strict order in the top. According to what your father was, you must take an opposing path. Also, law does not exist anymore. Its literally, Jewish Racial Oligarchy over the Goyim animals, where the only law is the Talmud.

What about National Socialism though? So many people are oblivious to facts about National Socialism. First of all, National Socialism has something neither Communism or Capitalism, or any other system of the enemy will develop. They have a spiritual aim and a spiritual reason to exist, which is given to all people. People are allowed to seek the Gods of their Ancestors and through this practice, develop higher states of consciousness. Since the model of National Socialism is Aristocratic, those who are Aristocratic (aristocracy proven by what they do for the Whole to their Nation or Race) they are elevated or downgraded accordingly. Money is not how someone's social class is defined, but they do not lose their possessions in anyway, at all. Ideally there are also loans without severe interest, so people can get ahead with their ventures.

The working class is supposed to have big benefits such as free vacations, easy access to cars, health or , state funds for raising children that increase with more children one has, and in sometimes workers get houses or housing by the State as gifts for many years of work. So long someone works even the simplest job, they always have money and food available. People who own the corporations, aren't above the State and in a correct National Socialist regime, pressure is added on them to treat the workers in the best and most humane way possible. The most important aspect is that people are no longer judged by how much money they make, or what kind of cloths they wear, and as such, nobody is forced into usury and exploitation in order to get "better" and come on top. There are also programs for health, wellbeing, arts, assosciation and whatever else, so people don't have to actually try to look very far to find anything.

Schools are accustomed in such a way that the individual's talents and tendencies are taken in consideration, not only what the State supposedly needs. All that one has to do is do their part in sharing the labor that must be shared for the State. The more labor and the more responsibility one takes, the higher they rank. Most social benefits such as free time and freedoms, are for those in the working class and not those in other Classes. The higher one goes, the more is the sacrifice, as people are leaders and not "bosses". Technically, the more "free" people are those who are living in the simpler jobs.

Women can evade all of this labor by merely staying at home, partaking in other social things and not work if that is their choice, as the house income is enough for both to live by one person working. There are no "window-shoppers" because everything that exists in the market is potentially affordable by anyone that puts their work on it, including houses and cars. The system is not based around the jew sucking dry people blood of their money, but actually living their actual life. Retirement should ideally work perfectly as well in the same way. With Xianity and the jews out of the way, things just start to merely fall in place. The highest teacher is Nature, so people do not live in their own manipulated reality, but they live with the laws of nature. Without xianity in place, there can be no misunderstandings of such.

Opportunities are really for everyone and not just an illusion, as the National Socialist regime should ideally focus on creating jobs. People that want to work . Large part of this is that the currency is not under the control of some foreign alien entity like the jew, so it can be adjusted based on the real wealth of a State or economy. The notion of debt that gives someone a "push" and then enslaves them for their whole life, is eradicated. Also last but not least, people have guns and are allowed of gun ownership. Contrary to politicians who always blame the people from which they steal and usury, for their mistakes, in the Aristocratic regime everyone has power over what they are responsible of.

If someone fails they admit failure and they are replaced, the people don't get the blame for it. This is the illusion of democracy that if you vote for something by deception, or one of the two jew owned options you are somehow responsible for what follows. But its just the jews. In the Aristocratic regime, the Gentiles in charge admit failure. This in Japan is on the other end where if people fail miserably or they do a mistake that destroys the whole, they do "Sepekku" or "Harakiri" and kill themselves out of disgrace. Many NS officers did the same for having failed at appointed things, but not due to the fact they were forced, only due to personal honor.


Gun ownership was allowed in NS Germany. Makes you wonder why millions of people in Hitler's parades didn't pull out one gun to "end" the "oppression". Oh wait, because there was none and your SJW or Feminist teacher lied to you. Did she also tell you that German women were the first one's to wear bikinis? Or that they actually had all the choices of high heels and all this "modern stuff" that people pretend that didn't exist in NS Germany?

Lastly, the National Socialist state has spiritual values, none of which the other types of state do possess. These have nothing to do with the fake bible of the jews, Sharia law, or the Commie Bible of Marx. These have to do with Nature. People don't work just for gains, they work to expand life, evolve life, and mutually share as a Volk, the labor that is given to them. This is why people need to work. The value of personal Honor is taken first. The society is classless, as there are no classifications or more or less honor for people based on their paycheck, but actual work and labor for the State. The Fhurer is equally respected as the common day laborer from this standpoint, as everyone does what they are created to do. They are not the same in Ranking, but so long everyone serves how they are best capable to serve, they are all respected. People in simpler professions are not scorned and ridiculed in anyway, as everyone serves in the best way of their capability and will.

Everyone is ideally supposed to have free time, as nature is intact, to be able to advance spiritually or advance themselves. This ties into the Pagan dimension of National Socialism. Obviously anything revolving evolutionary things, is allowed, especially when it comes to meditations and all other things. The NS era was the time of German Spiritual (Pagan) revivalism. Xianity was supposed to be eliminated as it creates hatred, deceit, fear and dismay in a society. With the removal of the jews and their interests from a society (that are by nature opposing to Gentile interests as the jew profits by parasitism and keeping others down) not finally society can ascend to higher order. This is why in Hitler's time the sciences went over the top and why the latest scientific discoveries were quickly given to the people as benefits, without friction. Because it was from the people, to the people. The NS state was of the leading cultural milestones, or scientific milestones, or policy and freedom milestones on the planet at this point.

By now it should be apparent why National Socialism is hated so much from the jews. Its not due the Holly-Hoax that never happened, its not due to Mengele doing experiments that never happened, its not because Women had a Nazi in a Uniform Fetish, its not due to the fact they want to preserve any freedom that they have already stolen from you, its not because of any reason. Its just because they are blotted out and they return to the bottom of the existential ladder, forced to live like the rats they are, without the Gentiles paying for them, fighting their wars and elevating them into unprecedented freedom and status, on our expense of lifes, work and labor. The jew as the classical exploiter and with their megalomaniac "chosen of god" complex, cannot tolerate it, and they started two major world wars just to multiply their profits, kill Gentiles out of revenge (like the USSR where they murdered 40 million people cold bloodedly) and decimate the planet if needed as well. Billions of people are ravaged financially, mentally and spiritually everyday, we live in a society without a soul, because the jew as the Soul-Eater reigns on the top. National Socialism was attacked before it could grow its wings, as the magnificence it would bring into this world would leave no place of the parasitic jew to reign and exist.

So in closing, I really hope this cleared up the matter on what is what.
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Sun May 29, 2016 12:45 am
HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5327
The problem with capitalism from reading the Karl Marx of capitalism, Adam Smith himself from the money lending merchant class of low land Scots. Its just a continuation of Feudalism with money lenders and merchants as the new elites, plutocracy replacing the old aristocracy and church. From the start of capitalism in England it was just a cabal of merchants, money lenders and corporatist minded old order types centralizing themselves into a merchant enterprise. Most liberal philosophies are created by merchant, money humpers. As away to create a pseudo morality to justify the material, predatory mentality of this way of life. In the capitalist system you have a trine god of liberalism, capitalism and money elites as rulers.

Note thinkers such as Malthus were schooled by the works of Smith. The best work on the reality of capitalism was Swift's "A modest Proposal." Hunger games society.

Out of this world with the changing demographics' Industrialization brought, the rise of Socialism occurred. Which the Jewish capitalist's then created Marxism as the means to hijack and steer into the same old Jewish Feudalism. Marxism is just state capitalism. And the Jewish People control the state. The jews used the bourgeoisie in the liberal revolution and then the proletariat for the Marxism revolution.

Post Sun May 29, 2016 1:33 am

Posts: 708
Location: Hell's Army front line

Image
Sourd an chiehl
Verily blessed are those that are enwrapped in the realization of leaving the path of total destruction; taking the path of creation... The Satanic warrior despises comfort in the limited, yearns for the infinite, beyond all that is limited and becomes the truly defined limitless.

Keep doing Reverse Torah Rituals!
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie66 ... glish.html
post68097.html#p68097

Post Sun May 29, 2016 5:11 am

Posts: 145
How should the Leader of the country be elected in an ideal case?
1) By the people - for a short period of time (as in Democracy)
2) By the people till the death of the ruller
3) Through a Monarchy
4) Elected by Aristocracy (for example as the Doge of Venice)

I can see advantages and disadvantages in all systems.

Also what are the differences between Fascism and National Socialism? From what I see NS is very strongly tied to spirituality, whereas Fascism is not based at all on spirituality. But that's what you can find on the mainstream media...

Post Sun May 29, 2016 6:08 am
HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5327
Probably better to have a republic where the best of the Party members are selected for election with national vote. Republic's on the federal level with direct democracy on the local level and national level for referendum, seem to work better. Democracy as a populace system was only meant for city states of ten thousand or less people by the Greeks. Anything else they mentioned would need something else. Republican system allows for a better meritocracy. Even the ancient Aryan Kings were not rulers for life they stepped down from the throne when they became too old. And the aristocracy elected a new one.

Fascism can mean anything. A lot of times as in Latin America it was a marriage of corporatism and the state.



Deceneus wrote:
How should the Leader of the country be elected in an ideal case?
1) By the people - for a short period of time (as in Democracy)
2) By the people till the death of the ruller
3) Through a Monarchy
4) Elected by Aristocracy (for example as the Doge of Venice)

I can see advantages and disadvantages in all systems.

Also what are the differences between Fascism and National Socialism? From what I see NS is very strongly tied to spirituality, whereas Fascism is not based at all on spirituality. But that's what you can find on the mainstream media...

Post Sun May 29, 2016 12:07 pm

Posts: 348
HP Mageson666 wrote:
The problem with capitalism from reading the Karl Marx of capitalism, Adam Smith himself from the money lending merchant class of low land Scots. Its just a continuation of Feudalism with money lenders and merchants as the new elites, plutocracy replacing the old aristocracy and church. From the start of capitalism in England it was just a cabal of merchants, money lenders and corporatist minded old order types centralizing themselves into a merchant enterprise. Most liberal philosophies are created by merchant, money humpers. As away to create a pseudo morality to justify the material, predatory mentality of this way of life. In the capitalist system you have a trine god of liberalism, capitalism and money elites as rulers.

Note thinkers such as Malthus were schooled by the works of Smith. The best work on the reality of capitalism was Swift's "A modest Proposal." Hunger games society.

Out of this world with the changing demographics' Industrialization brought, the rise of Socialism occurred. Which the Jewish capitalist's then created Marxism as the means to hijack and steer into the same old Jewish Feudalism. Marxism is just state capitalism. And the Jewish People control the state. The jews used the bourgeoisie in the liberal revolution and then the proletariat for the Marxism revolution.


HP Don, in a true Satanic society, would there still exist material wealth? By that I mean possessing greater material assets than one's peers, through legal means. If money is no longer needed in a Satanic society, would material wealth become a thing of the past, or would that be Communist?
"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight,
and truth will again triumph."-Dr. Joseph Goebbels

Post Sun May 29, 2016 1:08 pm

Posts: 2734
Location: Internet — "The cradle of 21st century White Supremacy"

Deceneus wrote:
Also what are the differences between Fascism and National Socialism? From what I see NS is very strongly tied to spirituality, whereas Fascism is not based at all on spirituality. But that's what you can find on the mainstream media...

It was explained in "Understanding National Socialism" in Satan's Library:
https://web.archive.org/web/1/http://webzoom.freewebs.com/spiritualwarfare666/Understanding_NS.pdf

Post Sun May 29, 2016 5:06 pm

Posts: 403

Great post and also great informations about fascism! Thank you for everyone!
Image

"Spiritual satanism is national socialism at its very pure core."

topic2297.html

"Nazism IS Satan's New World Order."

topic5131.html

Image

Post Sun May 29, 2016 6:28 pm

Posts: 145
Thank you for the replies! Great information! Fascism is just a Totalitarian Regime, which happens to be a reaction against Communism, without a definite purpose for the future or the people. Mussolini just happened to copy some aspects of NS after many years, due to political circumstances.

Post Sun May 29, 2016 6:58 pm
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
HailVictory88 wrote:
HP Mageson666 wrote:
[...].


HP Don, in a true Satanic society, would there still exist material wealth? By that I mean possessing greater material assets than one's peers, through legal means. If money is no longer needed in a Satanic society, would material wealth become a thing of the past, or would that be Communist?


Yes. This should be self evident. This has to do with the work one puts into this and how much able and capable they are to benefit the greater whole. Possessions and having your own material goods, plus the ownership of guns are parts of the National Socialist mindset.

And yes, there will be economic divisions. It will not be like very important though as it is today, where all social values and who you are socially merely has to do with this. Your duty and your value, plus your spiritual capabilities and overall, what you give back to the whole is what is going to matter more, than mere possessions. Values will change and mere material wealth won't be able to make any useless retard and useless person feel "important" today, when mostly they are social parasites, let alone allow them as "on its own" to ride the social ladder, like in DemoKrazy.

Today, you just BUY yourself into the presidency. So the jews choose all presidents. That's Demokrazy. Voting doesn't really matter, as you won't even know of any other canditates that aren't payed in the big joo joo advertisement rings.

The meaning of National Socialism is to transcend gross materialism and physicality that is binding and take society to the next level, to the pleasures of life and advancement. Where work is not a curse anymore and its just to help the whole. Its meant to be a Cultural regime, not a regime based around the next loaf of bread. Away from the jewish misery where hunger, sickness and deprivation are the law, and the only way to be saved is to step on other people's heads. So long the above models are needed, we can use them. However, the True Ranking of Human beings must happen with spiritual, ethical, intelligence ranking and not merely how much money they have. We live in an era of hardcore, technological advances, and National Socialism always kept up with the latest advances and their health implementation.

In technical terms, one that benefits the whole more than a hoarder, will be higher in the social ladder and hierarchy, in National Socialism. The old days of the jews trying to make owning a disaster, cause of division and fear, or senseless aggression towards people who have "less", will be long over.

The "ideal" mindset of Capitalism, which HP Don covered and I have to add, was to create wealth for the people and others, and for the creators of this wealth to be wealthy too. Everyone gets wealthier. Behind "Capitalism" hid merely because those few Rich Gentiles and mostly, the jews, who wanted to buy themselves inside Politics and in the factors of the State, which unfortunately for them up to this time, were dominated by Gentiles. Inaware and stupid, xian Gentiles, but still, Gentiles. And the jew didn't want Whites or Gentiles with power and position, even in their own countries. So for the Rich Whites, they probably married them with jewesses, swindled them out, or bought their wealth. For others who were stubbornly into position, they used other means. It was just the paranoid jew wanted to achieve power in all the State sectors. The religious sector, they owned.

The Military sector they controlled through money (in the 1500's, Armies were bought), there was no law as they technically, hijacked this through xianity which became the "basis of law". One place remained, and this was State power. Therefore they needed to create the adjusting system to buy themselves into politics, no matter how retarded, and jewish they were. They had enough of controlling people from the back, so they just wanted to come out on top and let everyone know of their Talmudism. They had to slowly remove Gentiles all completely from all key-state positions. So with few Gentile lackeys who couldn't do anything but look past their own nose, other xian opportunists (who were sold out spiritually to the jews anyway, thanks Krayst) and the eternal rejects and retards, they marched on with "Capitalism". And they suceeded. Today is the climax of Capitalism, where you don't even have clear blooded Gentiles almost nowhere as Statesmen.

In Capitalism the only one's that could flourish were basically in their majority, the old guys who had the money in the prior regimes. Ie, the jews and their lackeys. Now if few instances of brilliant people came up and become Rich, the enemy used this to advocate Capitalism. The broad masses noticed wealth, only after many centuries and bloody warfare on the streets for their rights. The enemy had to go to an "opening" and through this opening, others of the lower classes came in as well. What is the end result, you can see in all Gentile states nowadays. Jewish domination, bottom to top. The only thing is that due to the fact that some people still own things, the enemy doesn't go forward to purge the people, but Communizes the situation, bit by bit...Like Hilary Kiketon, Racial infiltration, getting the people used to lower wages, shortages of food, the list goes.

Capitalism slowly turned itself into just another Communism, with people just being treated like slaves in the Feudal regime. Only now the Slaves, through liberalism mindset, weren't pure blooded Gentiles with the chance of revolting, but a more amassed clump of idiots. The enemy always takes in conjuction Race for all their actions, as they are not retarded like others. So the jews created Communism to balance out this equation they fucked up and control the opposition, because to begin with, people were treated like pigs in capitalism, no different than slaves. This is why the two major "ideas" of history are Communism, and Capitalism. While the "Third Idea" or the "Third way" is actually, the most "hated" one, National Socialism. National Socialism is immune to all the above issues and problems. Capitalism had few good promises and did SOME good, but not because of the jews and their lackeys, just because of the nature of the times. The jew turned this to where you merely steal wealth where you pretend to actually make owning wealth easier or expand it, such as in the case of "banking". Then they weaponized this against the Goyim. Banks started with jews, 100%. In the centuries, this escalated even harder.

It was a jewish idea. Since the jews were the only one's owning wealth of astronomical proportions since the Middle Ages (through the church mainly), the "States" oblivious to the jewish problem, trusted them. And then they got total power over Monarchs and Kings, also, States. The States in these centuries after the inventions of the Banks, were merely in a constant warfare (Pan-European Warfare) and merely, this was making sure the jews were giving huge loans to States, paying troops, while their cousins on the other side of Europe were cashing in. This is why the Rothschilds and others, forced themselves in the major Capitals of Europe. No matter what state won or lost, the jews always placed their bets on both, winning from both.

This went on and on, and the states had to constantly increase taxes and swindle the population in order to survive. Long story short, people needed to revolt against this. They killed their so called "Kings" but the jews remained untouched. Therefore, nothing really changed and its still the same deal. What HP Don mentioned about Feudalism, is just the fact. Feudalism was just a regime that continued by the wealthy kikes, since the Middle Ages, and only tried to catch up with the changing historical tide.

There is nothing Gentile about the times of the Middle Ages, Feudalism or anything else, contrary to what many idiotic "White Crusaders" might believe. These were literally of the most inglorious times for Europe and the White Race started murdering one another like pigs, for jewish interest. Xianity of course was the icing on the cake, stealing more money and acting as a seperate, "State Within a State".

Only after the French Revolution you can find SOME sort of "justice" coming in place, and the enemy has turned this in reverse to support Jewish Communism later and somehow try to link this with revolution towards "order". Nobody had a problem with order, but behind the so called order, were merely the jews. In fact, the populace had enough being swindled by the xian clergy (kikes and kike muppets) and the supposed "kings" who were just spiritually inaware and at the complete mercy of the jews, especially after 1500. This you can see in Rasputin's Russia. The Czar was just a baby that was just giving messages to Rasputin and asking him how to lead Russia. The jewface Rasputin of course made it a shithole, gave bad advice, a Revolt was caused, and the Czarist regime fell, to the cousins of Rasputin, the jews. This is what happens when you are an xian, slaver lackey, of the kikes. You just fail. With jews you lose.

Since the time of Rome, the jews have attacked and sicced onto Gentile leaders seriously. Many times making them spiritual and political puppets, or through indebting them. For more than a thousand years, we have had the same issue. Its just jews, jewing.

-High Priest Hooded Cobra 666
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Sun May 29, 2016 7:09 pm
HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5327
Ownership still exists in the Communist state. All wealth is transferred to the 1% of Party oligarch class, who are the Jewish race.

From observation of emerging trends the old economic model of life is ending a major plant Foxcon that builds products for Apple just fired forty percent of its work force. Due to automatization. This is the future almost everything from the manufacturing sector to the service sector is going to be automated. Other technology like 3rd printing will wipe entire industries out. So we are going to have to change our society from the current economic caste labour model.

With advanced tech that has been around we can create a situation with free energy and general automation that removes the cost of living. And with a new culture structure with a new economic one that gives people social equality, across all lines. Each citizen has the same constitutional rights, accesses to resources and care. With stream lining people based on their chart aspects each person can be given accesses to training for what they want to do in life. Not turn a widget line but actually do what their soul nature is to express themselves into the world. Each person can have the personal pride in this and that this helps society. This goes hand in hand with meta development of the person with the daily practices. That will replace the trained satisfaction of life is about selling ones labour or goods and that is the only reason to be. Instead Spiritual achievement.


HailVictory88 wrote:
HP Don, in a true Satanic society, would there still exist material wealth? By that I mean possessing greater material assets than one's peers, through legal means. If money is no longer needed in a Satanic society, would material wealth become a thing of the past, or would that be Communist?

Post Sun May 29, 2016 7:21 pm

Posts: 145
I would also like to present some problems that the leader election voting could present (and why most elections today are not fair).
In today's society we are used withUninominal Election, but this has serious problems:

Example (Majority dictatorship)
• Let {a, b, c, ..., , y, z} be the set of 26 candidates for a 100 voters
election. Suppose that:
• 51 voters have preferences abc...yz, and
• 49 voters have preferences zbc...ya.
• 51 voters will vote for a and 49 for z.
Comment
• In all uninominal election systems, candidate a will be elected.
Is a really a good candidate ?
• No: Nearly half of the voters see candidate a as their worst
choice! Whereas candidate b could be an unanimous second
best candidate !
• Simple majority allows dictatorship of majority and does not
favor consensual solutions.



Two stage uninominal elections: properties
Example (Not-respecting the majority of voters)
• Let {a, b, c, d} be the set of candidates for a 21 voters election.
Suppose that:
• 10 voters have preferences bacd,
• 6 voters have preferences cadb, and
• 5 voters have preferences adbc.
• At the first stage: b obtains 10, c 6 and a 5 votes.
• Their will be a second stage election with candidates {b, c}.
• This time b obtains 15, and c 6 votes.
• Candidate b is consequently elected.


The previous result is clearly different from what a majority of voters prefer:
• Indeed, an absolute majority (11 out of 21) apparently prefers
a and d over b !

I can give many more examples of how the uninominal elections are a very bad idea (in the second case we could introduce manipulation of the votes)


[b ]Condorcet’s method [/b]
Principle (Condorcet 18th century)
• In 1785, Condorcet suggests to compare pairwise all the
potential candidates.
• Candidate a is preferred to candidate b if and only if the
number of voters who rank a before b is higher than the
number of voters who ranks b before a.
• A candidate, who is thus preferred to all the others, wins the
election and is called Condorcet winner.

Comment
• The Condorcet winner is always preferred by a majority of
voters to all the other candidates.
• He always defeats all the other candidates in a sequential
election.
• A Condorcet winner is always unique

Example (The Condorcet winner)
• Let {a, b, c, d, e, f , g, x, y} be the set of candidates for a 101 voters
election. Suppose that:
• 19 voters have preferences yabcdefgx,
• 21 voters have preferences efgxyabcd,
• 10 voters have preferences exyabcdfg,
• 10 voters have preferences f xyabcdeg,
• 10 voters have preferences gxyabcdef ,and
• 31 voters have preferences yabcdxefg.
• Candidate x is here the Condorcet winner.

Borda’s method
Contemporary with Condorcet, Borda invented his nowadays
famous scoring method for computing the winner of an election:
Principle (Borda, 18th century)
In the marginal ordering of each voter, every candidate
appears at a certain rank: 1 fort the first, 2 for second, etc.
The sum of marginal ranks obtained by each candidate is
called its Borda score.
A candidate showing the smallest Borda score wins the
election and is called Borda winner.

Comment
• A Borda winner might not be unique. In this case all Borda
winners are considered equally preferred.
• Borda’s methods, besides determining the Borda winner(s),
renders by the way a weak ordering (ranking with possible
ties) of the candidates

Example
• Let {a, b, c, d} be the set of candidates for a 3 voters election.
Suppose that:
• 2 voters have preferences bacd, and
• 1 voter has preferences acdb.
• The Borda score of a is 2 × 2 + 1 × 1 = 5
• The Borda score of b est 2 × 1 + 1 × 4 = 6
• The Borda score of c est 2 × 3 + 1 × 2 = 8
• The Borda score of d est 2 × 4 + 1 × 3 = 11
Comment
• Borda winner is a.
• Condorcet winner is b.


What I wanted to demonstrate is that today's elections are unfair, and we should strive for a better system of Election. Borda's and Condorcet's Methods give us new fairly perspectives of how we should organize the voting (although still have problem, but they are much better!). Especially the Condorcet Winner of an election if it exists is the best choice!

Post Sun May 29, 2016 7:50 pm

Posts: 348
Thank you for your replies, HP Hooded Cobra and HP Mageson, they were very informative.
"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight,
and truth will again triumph."-Dr. Joseph Goebbels

Post Mon May 30, 2016 5:13 pm

Posts: 119
Wait Rasputin? Wasnt this the same rasputin that was said to be nigh godhead and was actually "on our side"¿. Now hes a crazy joo lol? Please explain.

Post Mon May 30, 2016 8:12 pm
HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5327
Evola's writing on Rasputin's sect the Khlysti were orthodox on the exterior but within had renounced Christianity. And practiced an ancient form Bacchus rites. Rasputin was a spiritually activated and it seems advanced being. He had Siddhi's. Such as clairvoyance the information Rasputin gave the Czar from what I remember was to stay out of the war as it would destroy Russia. Rasputin was able to heal the Czar's son. Even by long distance shaktipat. He healed his son when he was about to die in Poland when he was dying from hemophilia. It seems certain members of the Aristocracy were jealous that a Siberian peasant, which Rasputin was, held so much influence with the Czar. After the murder of Rasputin everything went downward for the Czar and monarchy. Rasputin warned the Czar in a letter a few days before his death. That if the Russian people killed him things would be fine. But if Rasputin was killed by the upper classes members the Czar's family would only live two years after. This came to pass.

If the Czar had listened to Rasputin there would have been no first war and the Jewish attempt to create a Marxist dictatorship would have failed. Its probably no mistake some crazy Xian fanatical almost killed Rasputin right around the time the Czar was making the decision.

Rasputin appeared in St. Petersburg when the new social fashion was to embrace new spiritual ideals and mystic's from outside the mainstream Church. A lot of these characters were making their way in the Salon's and hall's of the city. Rasputin quickly rose to the top of all this as he had legitimate spiritual power. The Czar and Queen had met with most all of them. So when they met Rasputin that is revealing as how they reacted.

A lot of what scandalized Rasputin was simply he was Siberian Peasant and lived openly like one. Basically today we would call him a total bro. And being a peasant he over indulged himself. If your raised dirt poor and then are put into splendor of Imperial favour......The boshelvik's did use some of this as propaganda. But whatever. Even after his murder its not like they stopped being bosheliviks.



AOIVEAE wrote:
Wait Rasputin? Wasnt this the same rasputin that was said to be nigh godhead and was actually "on our side"¿. Now hes a crazy joo lol? Please explain.

Post Mon May 30, 2016 11:42 pm
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Evola's writing on Rasputin's sect the Khlysti were orthodox on the exterior but within had renounced Christianity. And practiced an ancient form Bacchus rites. Rasputin was a spiritually activated and it seems advanced being. He had Siddhi's. Such as clairvoyance the information Rasputin gave the Czar from what I remember was to stay out of the war as it would destroy Russia. Rasputin was able to heal the Czar's son. [...] Basically today we would call him a total bro. And being a peasant he over indulged himself. If your raised dirt poor and then are put into splendor of Imperial favour......The boshelvik's did use some of this as propaganda. But whatever. Even after his murder its not like they stopped being bosheliviks.


I was inaware of this info on Rasputin, as I don't have time to go around the posts. However I reply with the other side of the coin as this is something to be noted. This seems to be some sort of recurring pattern in Orthodox Xianity... What is your opinion on Gnosticism? Could this guy or his sect be Gnostics? Gnosticism is nothing but watered down Rabbinism, for Goyim consumption and maybe even freemasons who want a false sense of power. The jude however, pull the strings.

I am reading bizzare poems around about how they engaged in rituals and other things. However, in Orthodox Xianity there is a caste that is named "Eso-Khlysti" or "Khlysti" (means enclosed in a cell) that are just the worst Talmudists of all times, no different than the highest ranking Rabbis in Judaism. These are the ones that pull the real, spiritual strings behind orthodox xianity. This leaves the whole thing in between this. They still up to this day have a lot of their tracks covered. Rumors have it they even engage in sodomy and other bizzare things and they say they even talk with "Jesus", which is blantant that they speak with hostile entities. And judging from xianity in general, they are up to zero to no "good", as they are supposed to be the invisible commanders of xianity.

However, about certain sects in general, worshipping the old Gods, I have heard the same about Tibet around, that they don't all worship this low level spirituality that has been imposed later on them, neither the love and rainbows, teachings. Chances are he had a beef with generals though and they hated them. If he really tried to do so much good, escaped under the noses of the xian church, etc, congratulations... I can't really buy the story though, as the Orthodox Xians do similar kind of crap.

I explain of this so my thesis won't seem as a mere thesis. Its not just speculation.
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Tue May 31, 2016 3:17 am
HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5327
Christianity didn't reach into those regions in some cases till the 17th century. There are still regions openly Pagan today around there I believe. Its plausible certain ancient teachings remained intact in small sects that hid themselves. The Orthodox Church had banned the sect Rasputin was in.


Gnosticism was Pagan and based on the four levels of the work. Gnosis relates to the serpent. Gnadir means serpent in Gaelic as well. The ancient Gnostic's were serpent worshippers. Over time this was corrupted by the enemy. That is why its a generic catch all meaning these days.

Post Tue May 31, 2016 4:03 am

Posts: 708
Location: Hell's Army front line

HP Mageson666 wrote:
Gnosticism was Pagan and based on the four levels of the work. Gnosis relates to the serpent. Gnadir means serpent in Gaelic as well. The ancient Gnostic's were serpent worshippers. Over time this was corrupted by the enemy. That is why its a generic catch all meaning these days.


The great work?
Sourd an chiehl
Verily blessed are those that are enwrapped in the realization of leaving the path of total destruction; taking the path of creation... The Satanic warrior despises comfort in the limited, yearns for the infinite, beyond all that is limited and becomes the truly defined limitless.

Keep doing Reverse Torah Rituals!
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie66 ... glish.html
post68097.html#p68097

Post Tue May 31, 2016 4:05 am

Posts: 708
Location: Hell's Army front line

Yes, it has four levels. I just looked it up.
Sourd an chiehl
Verily blessed are those that are enwrapped in the realization of leaving the path of total destruction; taking the path of creation... The Satanic warrior despises comfort in the limited, yearns for the infinite, beyond all that is limited and becomes the truly defined limitless.

Keep doing Reverse Torah Rituals!
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie66 ... glish.html
post68097.html#p68097

Post Tue May 31, 2016 7:33 am

Posts: 145
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Christianity didn't reach into those regions in some cases till the 17th century. There are still regions openly Pagan today around there I believe. Its plausible certain ancient teachings remained intact in small sects that hid themselves. The Orthodox Church had banned the sect Rasputin was in.


Gnosticism was Pagan and based on the four levels of the work. Gnosis relates to the serpent. Gnadir means serpent in Gaelic as well. The ancient Gnostic's were serpent worshippers. Over time this was corrupted by the enemy. That is why its a generic catch all meaning these days.



What was the reason the Christianity got divided into 2 in 1054. Basically they have the same teachings. Only very small differences regarding the interpretation of their characters, the relationship status of the priest and their general view on divorce. Catholics just like to do more sculptures, and Orthodox more paintings.
But all in one they teach the same slave mentality to the Goyim... The only real difference I see is the administrative power of the Pope (global) vs Patriarch (more local). But was this really the only reason to split in 2?

Post Tue May 31, 2016 7:44 am

Posts: 61
Social Nationalism is a new understanding of the world through a new understanding of people in the country. He came first as an inevitable reaction to the individualistic conception of democracy and liberalism as its economic basis. Then build in a particular system, particular doctrine, with particular looking at the man, the citizen, society, country and exchange productive assets.

So, modern nationalism creates a synthesis of national and social which include one to another! Thus, it is antithetical to democracy. It follows that he was against individualism, against economic liberalism, against Marxism.

He is against individualism in that it does not consider the individual(s) but, rather, viewed it as the product of a people whose special racial, ethnic and historical psyche development process are the same individual. Therefore, the framework in which the individual is born, formed and work, it is the nation-state, a whole spiritual and historical environment, which is remarkable!

Consequently neither physical nor spiritual goods of individuals or their organizations, they can not be absolutely their ownership. Their production, circulation, and the division of power have a reason only if it is about individuals as a means, not as a final goal. Therefore, the state controls, determines, regulates and prohibits ...

National Socialism is contrary to Marxism in any form: classical socialism, communism, social-democracy or Bolshevism. Marxism is not only the seedlings of democratic conceptions of the world. If man is the ultimate goal of all, and people are the same everywhere - the state is not required; its history is just a coincidence that may or may not be. Hence the internationalism that recognizes no spiritual value: not a man, not a social, not a national collective. In this sense, Marxism is against history because it stops - all human activity stops on its stomach. This is a man - a machine. A social nationalism seeks man in the country because of the state and with the state. So, it is a movement, action, creativity, progress. By emphasizing the cult of the state a citizen becomes more alive because he creates this cult. This is complementary: if an individual creates a stronger state, then his security is greater.

Uninitiated and opponents of transferring social nationalism that continuous show of the cult of the state, inevitably leads to imperialism, to international conflicts. The same can be transferred to democracy. Democracy has led to wars because it was not perfect universal conception of the world, but rather a universal political system. Social Nationalism, on the contrary, has no aspirations to become a universal political system, but it is a general conception of the world: primarily taking into account the constant elements of each nation individually (national sentiment, history, traditions, spiritual values). Thus, social nationalism is not a casual experiment, but a historical necessity: a synthesis of experience of the past and predict the future of each nation individually. As such he can not be a copy but an expression of the political situation of a particular environment. So, it can be universal only as a doctrine, not as a political system. And these are two completely different concepts that are naive or malicious confuse everywhere and in our country. Therefore, our future political system to the concept of social nationalism and can not be other than solely an expression of our own opportunities. This truth became so clear and understandable, and yet many of us, with, or without legitimacy, are still not accepting it.

-Serbian youth almanac 1942
Lazar Prokić

Post Tue May 31, 2016 4:17 pm
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
Deceneus wrote:
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Christianity didn't reach into those regions in some cases till the 17th century. There are still regions openly Pagan today around there I believe. Its plausible certain ancient teachings remained intact in small sects that hid themselves. The Orthodox Church had banned the sect Rasputin was in.


Gnosticism was Pagan and based on the four levels of the work. Gnosis relates to the serpent. Gnadir means serpent in Gaelic as well. The ancient Gnostic's were serpent worshippers. Over time this was corrupted by the enemy. That is why its a generic catch all meaning these days.



What was the reason the Christianity got divided into 2 in 1054. Basically they have the same teachings. Only very small differences regarding the interpretation of their characters, the relationship status of the priest and their general view on divorce. Catholics just like to do more sculptures, and Orthodox more paintings.
But all in one they teach the same slave mentality to the Goyim... The only real difference I see is the administrative power of the Pope (global) vs Patriarch (more local). But was this really the only reason to split in 2?


One of the shops you own (Catholicism) starts to be seriously hated for certain reasons by a certain part of the population. You get these reasons its hated, you create a second shop without this, and the people that hate you go to the other shop, thinking its different. Same Goyim, same jews behind all of it, absolutely no difference. The same pattern the enemy follows with lately the New Age, the "Aquarian Age-ists", David Kike-ism, Korean Jewsus, Feminist Jewsus, Jewsus the Capitalist, Communist Jewsus, Liberal Jewsus, Jewsus with a reptilian foot, Jewsus with a reptilian hand, Jewsus Aryan, Jewsus Gentile, the list goes and the list goes on until the end of time.

When something is bad, they replace it with something seemingly different, with the same core. This keeps and keeps going all the time, until the enemy gets into the time continuum place in history where they impose global communism, which has been the original goal. One has to look at jews from a higher standpoint. Looking at only certain historical instances prove nothing. The jews are an element that has been around for 2500 years, inside our midst. They have mastered the art of deception. Its either you remove the whole infected limb, or you just await for the next infection to rise. Its the jewish infection, and it must be removed from our midst.
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:39 am

Posts: 61
Well, they split mostly because roman(byzantine) emperors didnt want to answer on religious matter to pope in Rome. They think of themselves as only real inheritors of ancient Roman empire. Legacy of Rome was Constantinopole. When power and influence of Constantinopole started to fade, and first fall by the crusaders, many ordothox countries started to fight for church independence, and their own patriarchs.
So in general, clergy in orthodox countries was(is) not full of jews(almost at all) as in west.
But anyway, even if patriarchs and priests were gentile, they still, and people of that countries followed jewish teachings of Bible and Christianity. That is enough damaging by itself. So, as HP said, it is just another jewish system.

I live in orthodox country. People pray on Jesus, fictional God, and on sermons in church, Israel and jewish people are glorified. Horible! Dumb people dont even see what is done to them. :evil:

Post Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:53 am
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
Dracul wrote:
Well, they split mostly because roman(byzantine) emperors didnt want to answer on religious matter to pope in Rome. They think of themselves as only real inheritors of ancient Roman empire. Legacy of Rome was Constantinopole. When power and influence of Constantinopole started to fade, and first fall by the crusaders, many ordothox countries started to fight for church independence, and their own patriarchs.
So in general, clergy in orthodox countries was(is) not full of jews(almost at all) as in west.
But anyway, even if patriarchs and priests were gentile, they still, and people of that countries followed jewish teachings of Bible and Christianity. That is enough damaging by itself. So, as HP said, it is just another jewish system.

I live in orthodox country. People pray on Jesus, fictional God, and on sermons in church, Israel and jewish people are glorified. Horible! Dumb people dont even see what is done to them. :evil:


Yes, the cowardly and stupid of the White Race can be definitely found in the church, let aside the Race traitors. Though many are not Gentiles as one would like to believe. Or they are Gentiles.... Who praise Israel and the Jew on the Stick by getting State, hard earned, money, just to curse their own people. However I believe there are many jews in this institution, especially if one looks closer. The normal pastors and stuff tend to be Gentiles in some cases. It serves better to infiltrate through one's own, as it gives double thoughts and makes things look different.

In certain other countries, its full Rabbinism and Talmudism. People are not excused over their "blood". They are more obnoxious and oppressive, psychos, and have done in many cases more damage than the jews themselves. Because they are not blantant jews.

How much responsible they are is up to the amount of knowledge they possess about this conspiracy and if they willingly work against it. One typically understands this is a jewish hoax in just the first month of being ordained or having their church study done. Most of these people also have entirely given ""their"" people up, to serve the jews willingly.

Now we happen to know the jews are behind this, but when encountering them, its the same jewish cyborg. They also all accept the Rabbis as the highest "spiritual" order, calling them fathers. After all they feel more honored in the prescence of the "line of Iakov" that they praise everyday, than their own people.

So in a real observation...what Gentiles are they...After all the goal of xianity is to reach the jewish heaven, become a cyborg and become a reborn "Yisrael" out of 144,000 of "G-d's" favorite, beta cuck slaves, to sign praise into Jewhova for the rest of eternity. This is achieved by faithfully serving the chosen of JHVH, down here. So when you see these guys just remember their goal.
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:38 pm

Posts: 145
I also lived in an Orthodox country and I can confirm that heavily indoctrinated religious people there are extremely dumbed down and stupid. Most people don't try to study anything and accept the norm of society... to the point that even if you prove them wrong they will still cling to their blind fate, while admitting that they are wrong :(

Although it doesn't take long to convince a person that Christianity is a hoax (usually after 30 minutes of conversation), and made by Jews (it can take up to 1 month to get rid of old habits). The hardest thing while exposing Jews is to convince someone that not all Jews are like this. And to convince one of this takes a lot of time maybe more than a year. They have to arrive at a certain level of spiritual understanding, on how Jews operate at a spiritual level.

This is a site with the highest ranking bishops of Romania (an Orthodox country) are there a lot of Jews here? I think that 70%+ are Gentiles, but could be wrong, because in Eastern Europe (where most Patriarchies are) there are a lot of Crypto Jews, being hard to spot.

http://patriarhia.ro/members-of-the-hol ... 15-en.html

Post Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:15 am

Posts: 61
People must understand one major difference between Catholic and Orthodox church. Catcholic is international, while Orthodox is not! I do not try to defend orthodox in any way, I already said it IS jewish program, and it is run by gentiles(if we can call them that way) who worship jews(some very consciously, some not ) and all their evil agendas against non jews. It is one dangerous program, same as western church, but we should not point fingers at every person who runs jewish programs, and think it is jew. Point is, in eastern churches, every church is separated, and run patriarch, who is as far as I know, in my country at least, always of that people.
There are many non jews who work for jews and their goals.
Like in that ritual we did, against jews and their lackeys, we must fight against all of them!

Post Sat Jun 04, 2016 1:30 am

Posts: 708
Location: Hell's Army front line

HP Mageson666 wrote:
Christianity didn't reach into those regions in some cases till the 17th century. There are still regions openly Pagan today around there I believe. Its plausible certain ancient teachings remained intact in small sects that hid themselves. The Orthodox Church had banned the sect Rasputin was in.


Gnosticism was Pagan and based on the four levels of the work. Gnosis relates to the serpent. Gnadir means serpent in Gaelic as well. The ancient Gnostic's were serpent worshippers. Over time this was corrupted by the enemy. That is why its a generic catch all meaning these days.


Now that I think about it (Bacchus, Dionysus) I think the olives and the wine represents the pinal gland and the solar chakra; the holy grail...

Image

Post Sat Jun 04, 2016 3:28 am

Posts: 708
Location: Hell's Army front line

I meant grapes not olives.

Post Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:30 am

Posts: 1159
Location: Satan's Earth

Marsayate wrote:
"National Socialism was the shortest lived, yet the most effective regime in history." -Marsayate



You can't state something obvious and claim it as your own quote.

"The sky is blue." -Lydia

"Cows eat grass." -Lydia

"Jews are gross." -Lydia

"Satan is awesome." -Lydia

I mean, wtf?
The better and stronger my brethren are, the better and stronger our future:
http://www.josministries.prophpbb.com/post86525.html


I'm tired of the jew corruption and torah curses ruining our civilization. I want to live in Paradise already... don't you?
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie66 ... glish.html

Post Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:05 pm

Posts: 170
"Lydia is right" -member22, 2016
eheh

Post Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:03 am

Posts: 1159
Location: Satan's Earth

Marsayate wrote:
Lydia wrote:
Marsayate wrote:
"National Socialism was the shortest lived, yet the most effective regime in history." -Marsayate



You can't state something obvious and claim it as your own quote.

"The sky is blue." -Lydia

"Cows eat grass." -Lydia

"Jews are gross." -Lydia

"Satan is awesome." -Lydia

I mean, wtf?


Well then why don't you call out HC or anyone else who's popular for quoting themselves? I know they've done it at least once.


If someone actually creates a quote then they have every right to attach their name to it. But you didn't, you merely took a factual statement and attempted to make it your own quote. It's the same as someone going:

"If you turn on a light, the room will be brighter" and sticking their name at the end of it.
The better and stronger my brethren are, the better and stronger our future:
http://www.josministries.prophpbb.com/post86525.html


I'm tired of the jew corruption and torah curses ruining our civilization. I want to live in Paradise already... don't you?
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/pixie66 ... glish.html

Post Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:42 am

Posts: 25
What about as compared to a democratic republic?

Post Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:00 pm
Hoodedcobra666 User avatar
Site Admin

Posts: 1586
Location: America
Frige wrote:
What about as compared to a democratic republic?


Its similar to demokrazy. Democracy was intended to work on Town-States no bigger than 10,000 people, and those that could vote would be the well studied and such. Then this slowly escalated and expanded, to where it became Demokrazy of the Mass Media and Coproration donor jews. Actually its just slaver jewish oligarchy we have with a few laws here and there.

The most ideal is Aristocracy, because the Best defend the interests of all, and care for all. When this is not the case, we have oligarchy: few that care only about their own, all others as slaves.
http://www.joyofsatan.org

Come by and check Azazel's Marketplace!

http://www.josmarket.org

Help me grow a JooTube Channel for us all

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPTrmw ... fjz97Ciliw

Post Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:55 am

Posts: 25
hoodedcobra666 wrote:
Frige wrote:
What about as compared to a democratic republic?


Its similar to demokrazy. Democracy was intended to work on Town-States no bigger than 10,000 people, and those that could vote would be the well studied and such. Then this slowly escalated and expanded, to where it became Demokrazy of the Mass Media and Coproration donor jews. Actually its just slaver jewish oligarchy we have with a few laws here and there.

The most ideal is Aristocracy, because the Best defend the interests of all, and care for all. When this is not the case, we have oligarchy: few that care only about their own, all others as slaves.



Thanks for responding. Ah, if only that aristocracy stuff and did not turn into what you describe as oligarchy. As long as the individuals retain sovereignty all is well.


Return to JoyofSatan666