Board index JoyofSatan666 Review Of European History During The Dark Ages

Review Of European History During The Dark Ages

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Satan.

Topics of discussion include: Demons, Magick, Satanic Witchcraft and much more!

http://www.joyofsatan.org/

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Review Of European History During The Dark Ages



During the Period of Europe referred to as the dark ages, civilization did exist. The biggest lie seems to be that Europe got civilization off the Islamic Arabs. However this is well known the knowledge the Arabs held was from the Greco-Roman Empire. Many of the Arabs were also of Aryan blood as well at this point. Saladin was a Kurd with blonde hair and light eyes. Mecca and Medina was created by Aryan Brahmana's from Western Aryan India. The Kabba was a Shiva temple originally. The Nabataean of the Arab region where Aryan People who honored Bacchus. The Sumerians, Chaldeans were Aryan Peoples who migrated from Aryan India. The Yezidi's, the blonde blood line stated they came from Northern India. And were the Chaldeans of ancient Sumer and Babylon. The Phoenicians were also Aryan People many of their images show them with Nordic appearance and their God was a red haired, blue eyed, thunder god.

A major claim made was the Berber's brought some higher Islamic civilization into Spain and though Europe. The Berber's were Whites from North Africa would had lived in North Africa during the Roman Empire as well. The Berber's are still known for their light eyes, fair skin and blonde hair. The Berber's were also part of the Vandal Kingdom that was built out of the Roman Empire. The Berber Empire in Spain, civilization was simply Roman if you look at the buildings you still see this in Roman architecture from the Eastern Roman Empire as well and in Greece.

As historians have pointed out the Germanic invasions didn't destroy the Roman Empires surviving knowledge they kept it and applied it for themselves. Germany is a nation of engineers who built the space age. They are not barbarians.

For some reason its a little known fact during the Dark Ages Ireland was still the educational hub of North Western Europe the Irish are responsible for civilization in much of Europe. The nobles of North Western Europe were going to Ireland to be educated in all the sciences and arts. The Irish were responsible along with the Nobles of Northern Europe for building advanced structures based on a high knowledge of engineering and astronomy during the so called dark ages this documentary on the subject also shows these people were not Christians they were Pagans like the Cathar's. Ireland was invaded by a Christian Crusade in the mid 13th century and their history was rewritten by the Church with fake characters like St. Patrick.

The Viking Serpent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lCR5p14DcM

Ireland And The St. Patrick Fraud:
topic3105.html

The Templar's were from the old European nobility and were building massive cathedrals that took almost a century to build all across Europe, built in the style of the Celtic, Teutonic cultures. They did not get this from the east. They always had it. The Templar's were part of the Cathar culture who were part of the culture that built such in Norway the documentary shows. The Cathar castles are still around and show a major advanced knowledge of engineering and military science. The renaissance was simply when all this advanced further minus the attempts of the Church to slow it down. The Europeans were also sailing around the world even to America during the Dark Ages as the Rune Stones in America prove, which takes a advanced knowledge of maritime sciences. There were Universities all over Europe in the Dark Ages as well. Along with natural philosophy that contained physic's many of the ground for advancements that came later in the scientific age in Europe were laid in this period. The eye glasses were also invented in the Dark Ages which enraged the Church.

The fact is the Islamic world was working from a Hellenic, Roman blueprint. Like much of Europe. The best Islam came up with on its own was a insane idea that the laws of cause and effect didn't exist. Which is anti-scientific.


Posts: 170

. The biggest lie seems to be that Europe got civilization off the Islamic Arabs. However this is well known the knowledge the Arabs held was from the Greco-Roman Empire.


I agree with the majority of things you said here except.

Are you sure about that? Its a lie to say that Europe took no knowledge from the Aryan arabs of old particularly Egypt, and even during the Islamic era a few things were brought to Europe from the ME and also there was a large amount of Arab philosophers and intellects, that were shut down much like the church shut down European scientists.

In more ancient time, so many Greeks studied in Egypt and brought alot of knowledge back with them. Even if you look at the ancient arab architecture, it looks very similar to the European architecture, and the arab architecture existed long before the European architecture. Please know I am not trying to debunk you here,.

But what you said in regards to the arabs of old and them being Aryan I agree with fully. And anyone who has and does live in the ME will know these aryan arabs are very plentiful. Just look at the copts of Egypt of which I am of their blood, a vast amount of them have green or blue eyes and are fair haired and very, very white.

Im studying Irish History at the moment. The fucking up Ireland by the church was somewhat reversible as plenty of intellects were left. Celtic brehon law and old Celtic systems and the Aos Dana still remained, namely in Ulster and Connaught. The protestant/catholics monarchs in Britain deemed the ancient Celtic culture too savage so systematically destroyed it through the plantation. To destroy them even more the penal laws were introduces to dumb down the nation by forbidding them to get education.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com


Posts: 117
Thank you for this post!
Image

May the Truth
always bring you
Joy


Posts: 44
Location: Valhalla
Interesting... Because if you look at some of the portraits of "berber" writers like this one of Apoleius:

Image

It's clear that they were much different than most Arabs in modern day morroco or algeria, yeah it's astonishing how most people seem to neglect the roman-greek-germanic diaspora that existed in North Africa... The quantity of writers, scientists and philosophers that were "berbers" in fact the etymological meaning of "berber" or in arab "a-Mazigh" is "noble men" the same as in Aryan-"noble".
I am sure that Nero didn't set fire to Rome. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that , just as the commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the communists set fire to the Reichstag in 1932

-Adolf Hitler


Image


Posts: 24
So was the mandeans, the remenants of the sumerians. Most mandeans has white skin, black hair and dark eyes, some of them has blue eyes. Today the mandeans are the last gnostic sect with yezidis. Manda means ''knowledge'' in their books they have theology, astrology, comsology. The center of their religion is water batpism, wich really is an association with the soul (water)


Typical caracter traits of this people are Stubbornes, loyalty and competitive spirited. By the fact that they have survived with their faith and not falling down under judaism, christianity, islamic religions shows great pride and a sharp intutive mind.

Their creative abilites is shown in craftmanship as goldsmithing, boatboulding, and more.

They even denounce moses, nazarane as false prophets.

Today this people sadly as yazidis are facing exctinction by race mixing couse the most of the left 70 000 have emigrated to Australia, sweden and canada. The religion is loosing members aswell.

Let's hope nazism comes into place in time.
Imagine our beloved gods by our side, imagine our glorious planet earth spiritually alive, imagine our races proud and noble, imagine a world enlightened.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
From studying Coptic its basically Greek, what does that say about the Coptic's? The Arabs came far later on in time and swept into power with the overrunning of most of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Persian Empire in the east taking advantage of events that had left both powers weakened.

Egypt was already around for thousands of years before the Arab invasions, the Islamic Arabs destroyed much of what had not already been attacked by the Christian regimes. The Greeks had a common culture with Egypt from the start as both societies mention. The religion of Isis dominated the Roman Empire as it was a common Aryan culture. The Cathar Mary was actually Isis as Rahn pointed out. As Mary was originally a title of Isis, Isis Meri. The Coptic's from their culture are pre Arab.

The actually important interaction happened between the Sufi's, but the Sufi's were like the Templar's of the Islamic world they were not Abrahamist. The Sufi's built the Dome of the Rock which from looking at it had a different purpose. The god of the Sufi's was Al Khadir, literally Osiris [The Green Man] Al Khadir is also the title of Shaitan of the Yeidizi. And is the god of the Templar's if you look far enough to Sri Lanka its the name of Sanat Kumara/Shiva. The Sufi's created the Hassian sect because they were getting attacked from the Islamist's.

The Templar's already had this knowledge on their own in Europe as it was from the early cultural period. The Templar tales are allegorical if you studied their Mysteries its obvious.

Arab architecture didn't exist before European? Greek, Roman, Celtic, and others were around before the Arab Empire. Arab's didn't built Constantinople.

So no, Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs.


fourthreich666 wrote:
. The biggest lie seems to be that Europe got civilization off the Islamic Arabs. However this is well known the knowledge the Arabs held was from the Greco-Roman Empire.


I agree with the majority of things you said here except.

Are you sure about that? Its a lie to say that Europe took no knowledge from the Aryan arabs of old particularly Egypt, and even during the Islamic era a few things were brought to Europe from the ME and also there was a large amount of Arab philosophers and intellects, that were shut down much like the church shut down European scientists.

In more ancient time, so many Greeks studied in Egypt and brought alot of knowledge back with them. Even if you look at the ancient arab architecture, it looks very similar to the European architecture, and the arab architecture existed long before the European architecture. Please know I am not trying to debunk you here,.

But what you said in regards to the arabs of old and them being Aryan I agree with fully. And anyone who has and does live in the ME will know these aryan arabs are very plentiful. Just look at the copts of Egypt of which I am of their blood, a vast amount of them have green or blue eyes and are fair haired and very, very white.

Im studying Irish History at the moment. The fucking up Ireland by the church was somewhat reversible as plenty of intellects were left. Celtic brehon law and old Celtic systems and the Aos Dana still remained, namely in Ulster and Connaught. The protestant/catholics monarchs in Britain deemed the ancient Celtic culture too savage so systematically destroyed it through the plantation. To destroy them even more the penal laws were introduces to dumb down the nation by forbidding them to get education.


Posts: 170

HP Mageson666 wrote:
From studying Coptic its basically Greek, what does that say about the Coptic's? The Arabs came far later on in time and swept into power with the overrunning of most of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Persian Empire in the east taking advantage of events that had left both powers weakened.

Egypt was already around for thousands of years before the Arab invasions, the Islamic Arabs destroyed much of what had not already been attacked by the Christian regimes. The Greeks had a common culture with Egypt from the start as both societies mention. The religion of Isis dominated the Roman Empire as it was a common Aryan culture. The Cathar Mary was actually Isis as Rahn pointed out. As Mary was originally a title of Isis, Isis Meri. The Coptic's from their culture are pre Arab.

The actually important interaction happened between the Sufi's, but the Sufi's were like the Templar's of the Islamic world they were not Abrahamist. The Sufi's built the Dome of the Rock which from looking at it had a different purpose. The god of the Sufi's was Al Khadir, literally Osiris [The Green Man] Al Khadir is also the title of Shaitan of the Yeidizi. And is the god of the Templar's if you look far enough to Sri Lanka its the name of Sanat Kumara/Shiva. The Sufi's created the Hassian sect because they were getting attacked from the Islamist's.

The Templar's already had this knowledge on their own in Europe as it was from the early cultural period. The Templar tales are allegorical if you studied their Mysteries its obvious.

Arab architecture didn't exist before European? Greek, Roman, Celtic, and others were around before the Arab Empire. Arab's didn't built Constantinople.

So no, Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs.


fourthreich666 wrote:
. The biggest lie seems to be that Europe got civilization off the Islamic Arabs. However this is well known the knowledge the Arabs held was from the Greco-Roman Empire.


I agree with the majority of things you said here except.

Are you sure about that? Its a lie to say that Europe took no knowledge from the Aryan arabs of old particularly Egypt, and even during the Islamic era a few things were brought to Europe from the ME and also there was a large amount of Arab philosophers and intellects, that were shut down much like the church shut down European scientists.

In more ancient time, so many Greeks studied in Egypt and brought alot of knowledge back with them. Even if you look at the ancient arab architecture, it looks very similar to the European architecture, and the arab architecture existed long before the European architecture. Please know I am not trying to debunk you here,.

But what you said in regards to the arabs of old and them being Aryan I agree with fully. And anyone who has and does live in the ME will know these aryan arabs are very plentiful. Just look at the copts of Egypt of which I am of their blood, a vast amount of them have green or blue eyes and are fair haired and very, very white.

Im studying Irish History at the moment. The fucking up Ireland by the church was somewhat reversible as plenty of intellects were left. Celtic brehon law and old Celtic systems and the Aos Dana still remained, namely in Ulster and Connaught. The protestant/catholics monarchs in Britain deemed the ancient Celtic culture too savage so systematically destroyed it through the plantation. To destroy them even more the penal laws were introduces to dumb down the nation by forbidding them to get education.


If you thought that by arabs, I meant the islamic Saudi ArabIANS of the middle ages led by crypto-Jews, you truly are mistaken. Please, take this someone who lived in the arab world, speaks Arabic, is arab and knows his people very well: the Saudi arabians are no longer true pagan aryan arabs they were in ancient times. Neither am I talking about the Islamic arabs of the middle ages, if you read my reply you'd know that much. The epitome of the arabs are three countries/ancient empires, Ancient Egypt, Assyrian Empire/Levant areas and Sumeria.

Therefore when I say Arab architecture, I am talking about the architecture in the aforementioned Arab countries, which looks very, very similar to ancient Greek and ancient Roman, and Egypt was there before.. You cant deny, that Ancient Egypt, which existed long before ancient Greece did give ancient Greece a shit ton of knowledge. As I said, plenty of ancient Greeks and ancient wise men studied in Egypt. Following the invasion of Greece by the ottoman empire, they brought much of this knowledge with them to Rome, which was one of the 4 or 5 main reasons why the renaissance began in Italy.

Also, if the copts originate from Greece, would that not mean that My entire family from my mother's side is greek?? No, don't quote me fully on this, but the copts date back to pharonic times. I can assure you that obviously my people know more about themselves than any wikipedia page or books does in the western world, after all, Egyptologists study about Egypt in Egypt, not in Europa or USA. We like the Greeks now, and we loved them back then, they did us an repayable favour and one of our main cities is named after Alexander.

I think I misunderstood you, I thought you were referring to the Arabs of empires like Ancient Egypt, and you probable thought I was referring to the Islamic empire. Why would I glorify the people behind the destruction of my people? More than anyone in this forum, i am against the Islamic empire. And the only thing I said about the Islamic arab people was that there were intellects who were shut down by the pisslamists. Those pagan tribes that tries to break away from Islam were also annihilated.

I agree with the majority of what you said fully, but you didn't read my reply fully and properly Also, with respect, I'm getting a vibe that you took my reply personally, it really isn't my intention to cause problems, we have a greater goal at hand than a petty argument, but I am entitled to share my opinion or disagree, the same way you would if someone was talking about the Americans.

Were all fellow sloths here, so from one sloth to another, lets let this be a discussion, not an argument for I do enjoy reading the things you said about my people that I did not know, I'm reasonable and I generally like to avoid arguments unlike other "bronies" you've dealt with in the past.

But to clarify again, when you say arabs your are talking about the collective arab people, who the epitome of is Syria Iraq and Egypt. When you say Arabians you are talking about those in Saudi Arabians. This is the way Arabs have been thinking for a long long time, this is what legendary leaders like Abdel Nasir believed and this is what arab national socialists intellects and pan arabists like Arsuzi and Alfaq believed.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
None of those people called themselves Arab's or were considered such. Your dealing with Ancient Indo Aryans from Sumer to Asia Minor. That's a large leap to make on your part to the Arab Empire of the Islamic medieval period. I am not really going to spend my time debating your straw men arguments here. Your all over the place. Many of those people were Hellenic. Like the Copitc's. And were a part of western Roman civilization.

The fact is Europe didn't get anything from Islamic Arabs. The Islamic Arabs got anything they had off the previous Hellenic civilization.


fourthreich666 wrote:
If you thought that by arabs, I meant the islamic Saudi ArabIANS of the middle ages led by crypto-Jews, you truly are mistaken. Please, take this someone who lived in the arab world, speaks Arabic, is arab and knows his people very well: the Saudi arabians are no longer true pagan aryan arabs they were in ancient times. Neither am I talking about the Islamic arabs of the middle ages, if you read my reply you'd know that much. The epitome of the arabs are three countries/ancient empires, Ancient Egypt, Assyrian Empire/Levant areas and Sumeria.

Therefore when I say Arab architecture, I am talking about the architecture in the aforementioned Arab countries, which looks very, very similar to ancient Greek and ancient Roman, and Egypt was there before.. You cant deny, that Ancient Egypt, which existed long before ancient Greece did give ancient Greece a shit ton of knowledge. As I said, plenty of ancient Greeks and ancient wise men studied in Egypt. Following the invasion of Greece by the ottoman empire, they brought much of this knowledge with them to Rome, which was one of the 4 or 5 main reasons why the renaissance began in Italy.

Also, if the copts originate from Greece, would that not mean that My entire family from my mother's side is greek?? No, don't quote me fully on this, but the copts date back to pharonic times. I can assure you that obviously my people know more about themselves than any wikipedia page or books does in the western world, after all, Egyptologists study about Egypt in Egypt, not in Europa or USA. We like the Greeks now, and we loved them back then, they did us an repayable favour and one of our main cities is named after Alexander.

I think I misunderstood you, I thought you were referring to the Arabs of empires like Ancient Egypt, and you probable thought I was referring to the Islamic empire. Why would I glorify the people behind the destruction of my people? More than anyone in this forum, i am against the Islamic empire. And the only thing I said about the Islamic arab people was that there were intellects who were shut down by the pisslamists. Those pagan tribes that tries to break away from Islam were also annihilated.

I agree with the majority of what you said fully, but you didn't read my reply fully and properly Also, with respect, I'm getting a vibe that you took my reply personally, it really isn't my intention to cause problems, we have a greater goal at hand than a petty argument, but I am entitled to share my opinion or disagree, the same way you would if someone was talking about the Americans.

Were all fellow sloths here, so from one sloth to another, lets let this be a discussion, not an argument for I do enjoy reading the things you said about my people that I did not know, I'm reasonable and I generally like to avoid arguments unlike other "bronies" you've dealt with in the past.

But to clarify again, when you say arabs your are talking about the collective arab people, who the epitome of is Syria Iraq and Egypt. When you say Arabians you are talking about those in Saudi Arabians. This is the way Arabs have been thinking for a long long time, this is what legendary leaders like Abdel Nasir believed and this is what arab national socialists intellects and pan arabists like Arsuzi and Alfaq believed.


Posts: 647
Location: NGC 1316, Fornax cluster

Very interesting High Priest Mageson, thank you.
---Image---
ImageSieg Heil Father Satan! Image

"A true warrior never gives up,"- High Priestess Myla Limlal
"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead," -Benjamin Franklin
http://www.barenakedislam.com
You don't have to eat the cookie to read the fortune ;p

Peition to ban sharia law in the United States:
http://bansharialaw.com/


Posts: 170

My last reply was cut off. Anyway, please give me the same respect I give you. And please do not make claims about my people that you do not know. You know nothing about the Arab world and who is and who is not considered arab. I think Id know my people alot better than you. Reading some wiki page or some Cambridge book does mean you know more about my people than I do..I think an arab knows more about arabs than an American..

HP Mageson666 wrote:
None of those people called themselves Arab's or were considered such. Your dealing with Ancient Indo Aryans from Sumer to Asia Minor. That's a large leap to make on your part to the Arab Empire of the Islamic medieval period. I am not really going to spend my time debating your straw men arguments here. Your all over the place. Many of those people were Hellenic. Like the Copitc's. And were a part of western Roman civilization.

The fact is Europe didn't get anything from Islamic Arabs. The Islamic Arabs got anything they had off the previous Hellenic civilization.


fourthreich666 wrote:
If you thought that by arabs, I meant the islamic Saudi ArabIANS of the middle ages led by crypto-Jews, you truly are mistaken. Please, take this someone who lived in the arab world, speaks Arabic, is arab and knows his people very well: the Saudi arabians are no longer true pagan aryan arabs they were in ancient times. Neither am I talking about the Islamic arabs of the middle ages, if you read my reply you'd know that much. The epitome of the arabs are three countries/ancient empires, Ancient Egypt, Assyrian Empire/Levant areas and Sumeria.

Therefore when I say Arab architecture, I am talking about the architecture in the aforementioned Arab countries, which looks very, very similar to ancient Greek and ancient Roman, and Egypt was there before.. You cant deny, that Ancient Egypt, which existed long before ancient Greece did give ancient Greece a shit ton of knowledge. As I said, plenty of ancient Greeks and ancient wise men studied in Egypt. Following the invasion of Greece by the ottoman empire, they brought much of this knowledge with them to Rome, which was one of the 4 or 5 main reasons why the renaissance began in Italy.

Also, if the copts originate from Greece, would that not mean that My entire family from my mother's side is greek?? No, don't quote me fully on this, but the copts date back to pharonic times. I can assure you that obviously my people know more about themselves than any wikipedia page or books does in the western world, after all, Egyptologists study about Egypt in Egypt, not in Europa or USA. We like the Greeks now, and we loved them back then, they did us an repayable favour and one of our main cities is named after Alexander.

I think I misunderstood you, I thought you were referring to the Arabs of empires like Ancient Egypt, and you probable thought I was referring to the Islamic empire. Why would I glorify the people behind the destruction of my people? More than anyone in this forum, i am against the Islamic empire. And the only thing I said about the Islamic arab people was that there were intellects who were shut down by the pisslamists. Those pagan tribes that tries to break away from Islam were also annihilated.

I agree with the majority of what you said fully, but you didn't read my reply fully and properly Also, with respect, I'm getting a vibe that you took my reply personally, it really isn't my intention to cause problems, we have a greater goal at hand than a petty argument, but I am entitled to share my opinion or disagree, the same way you would if someone was talking about the Americans.

Were all fellow sloths here, so from one sloth to another, lets let this be a discussion, not an argument for I do enjoy reading the things you said about my people that I did not know, I'm reasonable and I generally like to avoid arguments unlike other "bronies" you've dealt with in the past.

But to clarify again, when you say arabs your are talking about the collective arab people, who the epitome of is Syria Iraq and Egypt. When you say Arabians you are talking about those in Saudi Arabians. This is the way Arabs have been thinking for a long long time, this is what legendary leaders like Abdel Nasir believed and this is what arab national socialists intellects and pan arabists like Arsuzi and Alfaq believed.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com


Posts: 1505
Location: Where
do you think its healthy for a person to derive his self worth from his racial background Don ?
Thoughts become things.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
If it was not the jews wouldn't be attacking it so much for Whites.

AmonRa666 wrote:
do you think its healthy for a person to derive his self worth from his racial background Don ?


Posts: 1505
Location: Where
makes sense
Thoughts become things.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
This just a last effort appeal to authority in the light of nothing else.

fourthreich666 wrote:
My last reply was cut off. Anyway, please give me the same respect I give you. And please do not make claims about my people that you do not know. You know nothing about the Arab world and who is and who is not considered arab. I think Id know my people alot better than you. Reading some wiki page or some Cambridge book does mean you know more about my people than I do..I think an arab knows more about arabs than an American..

HP Mageson666 wrote:
None of those people called themselves Arab's or were considered such. Your dealing with Ancient Indo Aryans from Sumer to Asia Minor. That's a large leap to make on your part to the Arab Empire of the Islamic medieval period. I am not really going to spend my time debating your straw men arguments here. Your all over the place. Many of those people were Hellenic. Like the Copitc's. And were a part of western Roman civilization.

The fact is Europe didn't get anything from Islamic Arabs. The Islamic Arabs got anything they had off the previous Hellenic civilization.


fourthreich666 wrote:
If you thought that by arabs, I meant the islamic Saudi ArabIANS of the middle ages led by crypto-Jews, you truly are mistaken. Please, take this someone who lived in the arab world, speaks Arabic, is arab and knows his people very well: the Saudi arabians are no longer true pagan aryan arabs they were in ancient times. Neither am I talking about the Islamic arabs of the middle ages, if you read my reply you'd know that much. The epitome of the arabs are three countries/ancient empires, Ancient Egypt, Assyrian Empire/Levant areas and Sumeria.

Therefore when I say Arab architecture, I am talking about the architecture in the aforementioned Arab countries, which looks very, very similar to ancient Greek and ancient Roman, and Egypt was there before.. You cant deny, that Ancient Egypt, which existed long before ancient Greece did give ancient Greece a shit ton of knowledge. As I said, plenty of ancient Greeks and ancient wise men studied in Egypt. Following the invasion of Greece by the ottoman empire, they brought much of this knowledge with them to Rome, which was one of the 4 or 5 main reasons why the renaissance began in Italy.

Also, if the copts originate from Greece, would that not mean that My entire family from my mother's side is greek?? No, don't quote me fully on this, but the copts date back to pharonic times. I can assure you that obviously my people know more about themselves than any wikipedia page or books does in the western world, after all, Egyptologists study about Egypt in Egypt, not in Europa or USA. We like the Greeks now, and we loved them back then, they did us an repayable favour and one of our main cities is named after Alexander.

I think I misunderstood you, I thought you were referring to the Arabs of empires like Ancient Egypt, and you probable thought I was referring to the Islamic empire. Why would I glorify the people behind the destruction of my people? More than anyone in this forum, i am against the Islamic empire. And the only thing I said about the Islamic arab people was that there were intellects who were shut down by the pisslamists. Those pagan tribes that tries to break away from Islam were also annihilated.

I agree with the majority of what you said fully, but you didn't read my reply fully and properly Also, with respect, I'm getting a vibe that you took my reply personally, it really isn't my intention to cause problems, we have a greater goal at hand than a petty argument, but I am entitled to share my opinion or disagree, the same way you would if someone was talking about the Americans.

Were all fellow sloths here, so from one sloth to another, lets let this be a discussion, not an argument for I do enjoy reading the things you said about my people that I did not know, I'm reasonable and I generally like to avoid arguments unlike other "bronies" you've dealt with in the past.

But to clarify again, when you say arabs your are talking about the collective arab people, who the epitome of is Syria Iraq and Egypt. When you say Arabians you are talking about those in Saudi Arabians. This is the way Arabs have been thinking for a long long time, this is what legendary leaders like Abdel Nasir believed and this is what arab national socialists intellects and pan arabists like Arsuzi and Alfaq believed.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
FourthReich, I disproved your last message its just an angry rant. Yes I disagree and I stated why. I have studied the history of that region most of my life.


Posts: 170

Anyway, I do not care about petty arguments Don. Disapprove this if you want, but I do not wish to go further more into an argument.


So I'm going to just avoid this thread, like I should have done in the first place.

Once again, have a good day comrade.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com


Posts: 941
Whites built civilizations, whether they are called Arabs, Muslims, or what ever.
The old images of the human past have faded, the outlines of leading
personalities are distorted, their inner driving forces falsely interpreted, their
whole nature for the most part totally misjudged. A youthful life force—which
also knows itself to be age old—is impelled toward form; an ideology, a world
view, has been born and, strong of will, begins to contend with old forms,
ancient sacred practices, and outworn standards. This means no longer
historically but fundamentally; not in a few special domains but everywhere;
not only upon the heights but also at the roots. - Alfred Rosenberg


Posts: 170

NaziMan12 wrote:
Whites built civilizations, whether they are called Arabs, Muslims, or what ever.


Yes you're right.
White Europeans,
White Arabs etc built civilizations.

But,

Protestant/Christian Europeans like Henry VIII destroyed civilizations
Muslim Arabs like the Caliphs destroyed civilisations.

Whether who built what and what built who, wherever religion took hold, it attempted to destroy.

Which is why the majority of Europe's advancements were made by non religious men during eras were religions were attacked, and the same in in the Arab world.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
This is not relevant to the fact Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs.

fourthreich666 wrote:
NaziMan12 wrote:
Whites built civilizations, whether they are called Arabs, Muslims, or what ever.


Yes you're right.
White Europeans,
White Arabs etc built civilizations.

But,

Protestant/Christian Europeans like Henry VIII destroyed civilizations
Muslim Arabs like the Caliphs destroyed civilisations.

Whether who built what and what built who, wherever religion took hold, it attempted to destroy.

Which is why the majority of Europe's advancements were made by non religious men during eras were religions were attacked, and the same in in the Arab world.


Posts: 170

Firstly, you are acting like that during the Arab Islamic era, there was absolutely no Arab intellects out of thousands of arabs who went against the oppression of intellectual topics like science and medicine by Islam.

Secondly, if certain knowledge and goods were already in Europe, what's the point of going to the ME? Perhaps you could give me a source accurately confirming your claim.

Lastly, are you aware that Arabs made medical advancements during the Islamic era that took until the early to late renaissance for your Europe to discover.? Astronomical advances also. Yes, scientific made by ISLAMICS were bs, I don't deny that. I am in no way claiming superiority here, I am being non biased here and giving credit to civilisations where it is due. You however are taking all credit away. I'm also not being a bigot.

You are ignoring what I am saying: Yes, ISLAMIC men and ISLAM-INFLUENCED Arabs made no, little or negligible advancements. It was SECULAR arabs who were looked down upon that made advancements that to this day Muslims and sheiks all over are claiming they are bs or are corrupting them.

HP Mageson666 wrote:
This is not relevant to the fact Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs.

fourthreich666 wrote:
NaziMan12 wrote:
Whites built civilizations, whether they are called Arabs, Muslims, or what ever.


Yes you're right.
White Europeans,
White Arabs etc built civilizations.

But,

Protestant/Christian Europeans like Henry VIII destroyed civilizations
Muslim Arabs like the Caliphs destroyed civilisations.

Whether who built what and what built who, wherever religion took hold, it attempted to destroy.

Which is why the majority of Europe's advancements were made by non religious men during eras were religions were attacked, and the same in in the Arab world.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs, what the Arabs had they got off the previous Hellenic, Roman civilizations. Which were a continuation of existing Aryan civilization. This was already in Europe. I already mentioned this. Sorry nonsense wrote by jews does not mean anything to me as jews are dishonest. Even the Berber Kingdom was Roman, Greek knowledge not Arab. The Berber's were part of the Roman Empire for centuries. Even the People who built Petra were Hellenic.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Arab can be anything from this....

Image


To this......

Image


Posts: 170

HP Mageson666 wrote:
Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs, what the Arabs had they got off the previous Hellenic, Roman civilizations. Which were a continuation of existing Aryan civilization. This was already in Europe. I already mentioned this. Sorry nonsense wrote by jews does not mean anything to me as jews are dishonest. Even the Berber Kingdom was Roman, Greek knowledge not Arab. The Berber's were part of the Roman Empire for centuries. Even the People who built Petra were Hellenic.


What's your source for Hellenics building Petra. Show me an accurate, non biased and objective source to confirm the above, please. I don't care if the sources are a thousand pages long, ill read them, and the sources listed within them. I'm not a bigot, if the sources check out, I'm wrong and I will say so.

What Arabs had they got it of Rome? What ancient Empire influenced Rome and Greece I wonder? What ancient empire took in men to be educated there?

the ancient arab world, Masir, Assyrian Empire and Sumer had their info before the Romans did. You still are giving no sources... Anyone can make any claim and give no sources and say its right.

Let facts be facts. What came from the Arab world is Arab. What came from the European World os European.
Instead of "what came from the Arab world is European and what cane from the European world is European.

This is not stormfront here, for us to make false claims and discredit everything that is outside of Europe or America.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com


Posts: 170

HP Mageson666 wrote:
Arab can be anything from this....

Image


To this......

Image


By the way, with the first picture, you are defining arabs by Islam. So she you are saying those disgusting Muslims, you're saying those disgusting arabs?

I don't care if you bash on Muslims, but don't bash on Arabs. As far as I'm aware, that is breaking one of the rules of this JoS group.

Might as well make an account on stormfront if you want to bash on arabs instead of Islam.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Petra is a feminine version of the Greek Petros.....The fact their architecture was Hellenic and they wore Roman-Hellenic clothes and the records stated they honored Bacchus whom they even wore their hair in a specific style for seen in Celtics.

Taking random ancient Indo Aryan groups and grouping them as "Arab" is doing what again? I already stated the Hellenic's and Egypt had the same culture at the source as they both stated. Indo-European culture. It seems to blow your mind Europe didn't get anything off the Islamic Arab Empire. I think its something personal as you are constantly question begging. The word Arab was not put into vague till the later periods of the Arab empire. The earliest was an Assyria record mentioning Bedouin's. Not the Assyrian's referring to themselves.


fourthreich666 wrote:
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Europe didn't get anything off Islamic Arabs, what the Arabs had they got off the previous Hellenic, Roman civilizations. Which were a continuation of existing Aryan civilization. This was already in Europe. I already mentioned this. Sorry nonsense wrote by jews does not mean anything to me as jews are dishonest. Even the Berber Kingdom was Roman, Greek knowledge not Arab. The Berber's were part of the Roman Empire for centuries. Even the People who built Petra were Hellenic.


What's your source for Hellenics building Petra. Show me an accurate, non biased and objective source to confirm the above, please. I don't care if the sources are a thousand pages long, ill read them, and the sources listed within them. I'm not a bigot, if the sources check out, I'm wrong and I will say so.

What Arabs had they got it of Rome? What ancient Empire influenced Rome and Greece I wonder? What ancient empire took in men to be educated there?

the ancient arab world, Masir, Assyrian Empire and Sumer had their info before the Romans did. You still are giving no sources... Anyone can make any claim and give no sources and say its right.

Let facts be facts. What came from the Arab world is Arab. What came from the European World os European.
Instead of "what came from the Arab world is European and what cane from the European world is European.

This is not stormfront here, for us to make false claims and discredit everything that is outside of Europe or America.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Yeah this is something personal on your part....I have seen all types of Arabs up close and on film and they do range from the images mentioned and in-between. There are White People down to Negrotic types.


fourthreich666 wrote:
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Arab can be anything from this....

Image


To this......

Image


By the way, with the first picture, you are defining arabs by Islam. So she you are saying those disgusting Muslims, you're saying those disgusting arabs?

I don't care if you bash on Muslims, but don't bash on Arabs. As far as I'm aware, that is breaking one of the rules of this JoS group.

Might as well make an account on stormfront if you want to bash on arabs instead of Islam.


Posts: 170

Yeah, movies have ALWAYS been a reliable source on the topic of race and ethnicity etc. Lets base everything of movies you see in your cinema....perhaps you've never seen Arabic films that they show in the arab world, because they actually show the actual arabs.

Black people cant be true Arabs, you'd be deludes to believe so. Afro-arabs mainly came along due to the race mixing caused by Islam. Thats not to say the FEW arab aryan people mixed with blacks long, long ago before Islam.

Of course its personal, any national socialist would take it personally if someone spreads mis info and rubbish on his people.

HP Mageson666 wrote:
Yeah this is something personal on your part....I have seen all types of Arabs up close and on film and they do range from the images mentioned and in-between. There are White People down to Negrotic types.


fourthreich666 wrote:
HP Mageson666 wrote:
Arab can be anything from this....

Image


To this......

Image


By the way, with the first picture, you are defining arabs by Islam. So she you are saying those disgusting Muslims, you're saying those disgusting arabs?

I don't care if you bash on Muslims, but don't bash on Arabs. As far as I'm aware, that is breaking one of the rules of this JoS group.

Might as well make an account on stormfront if you want to bash on arabs instead of Islam.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com


Posts: 170

You are also acting like Hellenic culture wasn't influenced by Egypt and other empire in the ME, who the true arabs of today are descendants of.
Heil Hitler! Heil Himmler! Sieg Heil!

"This battle is not one for the present, but first and foremost one for the future!" - Adolf Hitler
23 heroes died for your future, 9 million good men were brutally murdered for it , so at-least work to preserve it, it is a duty as your future is in you hands alone
-fourtheich666

http://www.666blacksun.com
http://fourthreich666.com/
http://naziarchive.fourthreich666.com

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
This is a false statement on your part. I am not repeating myself as I have already made mention of this at least twice.

The fact is Arabization occurred in the ME due to the Arab Empire leading to the common use of Arabic today. No different then Romanization. These groups you mentioned did not consider themselves "Arab" previous to this period. This is the effect of Arab, Islamic Imperialism. Arab is obvious not a race as already shown its the left over collective Imperialist Identity of the Arab Islamic Empire. Egypt did not consider itself Arabic until centuries of Arabization of the Islamic Empire. Some Nergotic Arab is not the descendent of an Aryan Pagan Civilization of Egypt. The Coptic's are, yes and other White Egyptians but that's due to racial inheritance. Not something called Arab. Otherwise the Blacks who speak Arabic built Egypt after all.

Europe didn't get anything off the Arab Islamic Empire.


fourthreich666 wrote:
You are also acting like Hellenic culture wasn't influenced by Egypt and other empire in the ME, who the true arabs of today are descendants of.

HP Mageson666 Site Admin

Posts: 5226
Your making yourself look like an ass here.

I base this off watching numerous documentary films and thousands of news reports showing mass rallies and daily life in the Arabic world many made in the Arab world by Arabs themselves and also meeting Arabs in normal life.


fourthreich666 wrote:
Yeah, movies have ALWAYS been a reliable source on the topic of race and ethnicity etc. Lets base everything of movies you see in your cinema....perhaps you've never seen Arabic films that they show in the arab world, because they actually show the actual arabs.

Black people cant be true Arabs, you'd be deludes to believe so. Afro-arabs mainly came along due to the race mixing caused by Islam. Thats not to say the FEW arab aryan people mixed with blacks long, long ago before Islam.

Of course its personal, any national socialist would take it personally if someone spreads mis info and rubbish on his people.


Posts: 253
I just want to butt in here and make a point that Greece and Egypt emerged at about the exact same time and came from the exact same place and heritage. This period and area of Greece is called the Minoan culture today, their art and architecture looks very, very similar to the original Egyptian art and architecture. I'm sure Don, you already know this, but it is something that fourthreich is ignoring.
(As for Petra, there is no way that that is not Hellenic. Just imagine the buildings are made of white marble and free standing...you have Greek temples/buildings.)


Posts: 253
The point in my post was not to say which Aryans are better or whatever, but to show that we all have the same origin and it is from that origin that our knowledge comes from. Yeah Sumerians made advances so did the Greeks. The basis of knowledge is older than some geographical ethnic identifiers. But this argument of who is and isn't an Arab now is a little silly. Egyptians were Egyptians not Arabs. The name comes from Arabia, the Arabian peninsula. I guess the deal is now if your first language is Arabic, then your an Arab. I don't even know. It's just supposed to be an ethnic geographic identifier I'm guessing, but again I don't really know... I can just feel a lot of butt hurt going on here.


Posts: 253
Also, I have a question regarding the original post.

Mageson, what do you think about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelbren_y_Beirdd ? Like it says on there, most people agree it's a made-up hoax, but I find it hard to believe that the only form of writing by the Celtic/Irish was carving some horizontal lines on to a propped up rock. I'm just speculating that ogham wasn't the original or common script, maybe it was like a type of Morse code. All other alphabets seem to have origins in a hieroglyphic type system, if you look at archaic Sumerian and parent systems of Chinese and Phoenician and so on. But I also find it interesting just how much Latin script changed when it got to Ireland or at least when it was used for the old Irish manuscripts. (As i'm sure latin made it to Ireland much before xian manuscripts were being written.)


Posts: 1505
Location: Where
don has made his points very clear :p

TelocVovim666 wrote:
It is Mercury retrograde right now, and it can cause miscommunication or misunderstandings. Just keep that in mind
Thoughts become things.


Posts: 61
Off course ancient Mesopotamian civilizations were not Arabs! That's fact.
Even great Persian king Darius I, wrote:
I am Darius the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries containing all kinds of men, King in this great earth far and wide, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenian, a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage.
Yeah aryan.


Posts: 268
Location: Lemuria
Going back to one of the points you made about the Germans respecting Roman knowledge HP Don, you can see that here in England too with the Anglo Saxons, they really seemed to be in awe of the structures left behind by the Roman Empire.

Like with some of the poetry they wrote about the surviving Roman towns and villas they found when they first came here: "Where long since, a host of heroes, gold adorned gleaming in splendour, shone in their armour, gazed on gems and treasures, on silver, riches and jewelry, and on this bright city and its wide domains".
Image


Return to JoyofSatan666